By: Duncan S.B. No. 382
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
1-1 relating to the requirements for state agency orders adopting rules
1-2 and substantial compliance with rulemaking requirements.
1-3 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
1-4 SECTION 1. Section 2001.033, Government Code, is amended to
1-5 read as follows:
1-6 Sec. 2001.033. State Agency Order Adopting Rule. (a) A
1-7 state agency order finally adopting a rule must include:
1-8 (1) a reasoned justification for [of] the rule as
1-9 adopted consisting solely of [, including]:
1-10 (A) a summary of comments received from parties
1-11 interested in the rule that shows the names of interested groups or
1-12 associations offering comment on the rule and whether they were for
1-13 or against its adoption;
1-14 (B) a summary [restatement] of the [rule's]
1-15 factual basis for the rule as adopted which demonstrates a rational
1-16 connection between the factual basis for the rule and the rule as
1-17 adopted; and
1-18 (C) the reasons why the agency disagrees with
1-19 party submissions and proposals;
1-20 (2) a concise restatement of the particular statutory
1-21 provisions under which the rule is adopted and of how the agency
1-22 interprets the provisions as authorizing or requiring the rule; and
1-23 (3) a certification that the rule, as adopted, has
1-24 been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of
2-1 the agency's legal authority.
2-2 (b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require
2-3 additional analysis of alternatives not adopted by an agency beyond
2-4 that required by Subdivision (1)(C) or to require the reasoned
2-5 justification to be stated separately from the statements required
2-6 in Subdivision (1).
2-7 SECTION 2. Section 2001.035, Government Code, is amended to
2-8 read as follows:
2-9 Sec. 2001.035. Substantial Compliance Requirement; Time
2-10 Limit on Procedural Challenge. (a) A rule [adopted after January
2-11 1, 1976,] is voidable [not valid] unless a state agency adopts it
2-12 in substantial compliance with Sections 2001.0225 [2001.023]
2-13 through 2001.034.
2-14 (b) A person must initiate a proceeding to contest a rule on
2-15 the ground of noncompliance with the procedural requirements of
2-16 Sections 2001.0225 [2001.023] through 2001.034 not later than the
2-17 second anniversary of the effective date of the rule.
2-18 (c) A state agency substantially complies with the
2-19 requirements of Section 2001.033 if the agency's reasoned
2-20 justification demonstrates in a relatively clear and logical
2-21 fashion that the rule is a reasonable means to a legitimate
2-22 objective.
2-23 (d) A mere technical defect that does not result in
2-24 prejudice to a person's rights or privileges is not grounds for
2-25 invalidation of a rule.
2-26 SECTION 3. Subchapter B, Chapter 2001, Government Code, is
3-1 amended by adding Section 2001.039 to read as follows:
3-2 Sec. 2001.039. SCOPE AND EFFECT OF ORDER INVALIDATING AGENCY
3-3 RULE. If a court finds that an agency has not substantially
3-4 complied with one or more procedural requirements of Sections
3-5 2001.0225 through 2001.034, the court may remand the rule, or a
3-6 portion of the rule, to the agency and, if it does so remand, shall
3-7 provide a reasonable time for the agency to either revise or
3-8 readopt the rule through established procedure. During the remand
3-9 period, the rule shall remain effective unless the court finds good
3-10 cause to invalidate the rule or a portion of the rule, effective as
3-11 of the date of the court's order.
3-12 SECTION 4. Sections 2 and 3, Chapter 1067, Acts of the 75th
3-13 Legislature, Regular Session, 1997, are repealed.
3-14 SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 1999. The
3-15 change in law made by this Act applies to all rules adopted by a
3-16 state agency on or after January 1, 1998, except that the change in
3-17 law made by this Act does not apply to a challenge to a rule in a
3-18 court action that is brought before September 1, 1999.
3-19 SECTION 6. The importance of this legislation and the
3-20 crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
3-21 emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
3-22 constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
3-23 days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended.