By: Ratliff S.C.R. No. 33 SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 1-1 WHEREAS, Gibson Recycling, Inc., alleges that Gibson 1-2 Recycling, Inc., entered into an agreement with the Texas Natural 1-3 Resource Conservation Commission under the waste tire recycling 1-4 program to recycle waste tires; and 1-5 WHEREAS, Gibson Recycling, Inc., alleges that it performed 1-6 its obligations under the waste tire recycling program; and 1-7 WHEREAS, Gibson Recycling, Inc., alleges that the Texas 1-8 Natural Resource Conservation Commission failed to perform its 1-9 obligations under the agreement and under the waste tire recycling 1-10 program; and 1-11 WHEREAS, Gibson Recycling, Inc., alleges that the Texas 1-12 Natural Resource Conservation Commission has caused Gibson 1-13 Recycling, Inc., to undergo an audit on its operations under the 1-14 waste tire recycling program; and 1-15 WHEREAS, Gibson Recycling, Inc., alleges that the audit 1-16 division of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission 1-17 purposely manipulated the figures to show that Gibson Recycling, 1-18 Inc., had been overpaid by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation 1-19 Commission, when Gibson Recycling, Inc., alleges it had not been 1-20 overpaid; and 1-21 WHEREAS, Gibson Recycling, Inc., alleges that the Texas 1-22 Natural Resource Conservation Commission has failed to pay Gibson 1-23 Recycling, Inc., $400,000 to which it is lawfully entitled under 1-24 the waste tire recycling program; and 2-1 WHEREAS, Gibson Recycling, Inc., alleges that it has 2-2 sustained damages as a result of the actions of the Texas Natural 2-3 Resource Conservation Commission; now, therefore, be it 2-4 RESOLVED by the Legislature of the State of Texas, That 2-5 Gibson Recycling, Inc., is granted permission to sue the State of 2-6 Texas and the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission 2-7 subject to Chapter 107, Civil Practice and Remedies Code; and, be 2-8 it further 2-9 RESOLVED, That the remedies available to Gibson Recycling, 2-10 Inc., in the suit authorized by this resolution are limited to the 2-11 remedies traditionally available for breach of contract, but that 2-12 Gibson Recycling, Inc., may not recover punitive or exemplary 2-13 damages resulting from any breach of contract; and, be it further 2-14 RESOLVED, That Gibson Recycling, Inc., and the Texas Natural 2-15 Resource Conservation Commission may agree to submit the matter 2-16 that is the subject of this resolution to binding arbitration; and, 2-17 be it further 2-18 RESOLVED, That the executive director of the Texas Natural 2-19 Resource Conservation Commission be served process as provided by 2-20 Subdivision (3), Subsection (a), Section 107.002, Civil Practice 2-21 and Remedies Code.