LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 76th Regular Session March 22, 1999 TO: Honorable Paul Sadler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB907 by Siebert (Relating to attendance in public schools of persons over 18 years of age), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * HB907, As Introduced: positive impact of $16,000,000 through the * * biennium ending August 31, 2001. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2000 $8,000,000 * * 2001 8,000,000 * * 2002 8,000,000 * * 2003 8,000,000 * * 2004 8,000,000 * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: ***************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) from * * Foundation School Fund * * 0193 * * 2000 $8,000,000 * * 2001 8,000,000 * * 2002 8,000,000 * * 2003 8,000,000 * * 2004 8,000,000 * ***************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill would require school districts to revoke the enrollment of students age 18 or older who fail to attend school each day for the entire period of instruction. Methodology The Texas Education Agency assumes that the average daily attendance equivalent of 1,832 students would have their enrollment revoked under the provisions of the bill. This would result in a savings to the Foundation School Fund of approximately $8 million per year. Local Government Impact School districts that revoke enrollment under the provisions of the bill would experience a reduction in state aid. The Texas Education Agency estimates the statewide impact of this loss in state aid to be approximately $8 million per year. There could be offsetting savings to school districts associated with the reduction in student enrollment. Such savings would depend on the variable costs incurred by those students and the extent and length of enrollment terminations. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JK, CT, RN