LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 76th Regular Session
March 22, 1999
TO: Honorable Paul Sadler, Chair, House Committee on Public
Education
FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB907 by Siebert (Relating to attendance in public
schools of persons over 18 years of age), As Introduced
**************************************************************************
* Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for *
* HB907, As Introduced: positive impact of $16,000,000 through the *
* biennium ending August 31, 2001. *
**************************************************************************
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
****************************************************
* Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) *
* Impact to General Revenue Related *
* Funds *
* 2000 $8,000,000 *
* 2001 8,000,000 *
* 2002 8,000,000 *
* 2003 8,000,000 *
* 2004 8,000,000 *
****************************************************
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
*****************************************************
* Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) from *
* Foundation School Fund *
* 0193 *
* 2000 $8,000,000 *
* 2001 8,000,000 *
* 2002 8,000,000 *
* 2003 8,000,000 *
* 2004 8,000,000 *
*****************************************************
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would require school districts to revoke the enrollment of
students age 18 or older who fail to attend school each day for the
entire period of instruction.
Methodology
The Texas Education Agency assumes that the average daily attendance
equivalent of 1,832 students would have their enrollment revoked under
the provisions of the bill. This would result in a savings to the
Foundation School Fund of approximately $8 million per year.
Local Government Impact
School districts that revoke enrollment under the provisions of the bill
would experience a reduction in state aid. The Texas Education Agency
estimates the statewide impact of this loss in state aid to be
approximately $8 million per year. There could be offsetting savings to
school districts associated with the reduction in student enrollment.
Such savings would depend on the variable costs incurred by those
students and the extent and length of enrollment terminations.
Source Agencies:
LBB Staff: JK, CT, RN