LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 76th Regular Session April 8, 1999 TO: Honorable Senfronia Thompson, Chair, House Committee on Judicial Affairs FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB928 by Junell (Relating to the annual salary supplement paid by the state to certain county judges.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: *************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Savings/(Cost) from Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) * * Year Judicial Fund from Judicial Fund * * 0573 0573 * * 2000 $(1,020,000) $1,018,000 * * 2001 (1,023,000) 1,023,000 * * 2002 (1,024,000) 1,024,000 * * 2003 (1,025,000) 1,025,000 * * 2004 (1,026,000) 1,026,000 * *************************************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill would amend the Government Code to provide up to a $10,000 salary supplement to certain county court judges provided that the County Commissioners Court imposes additional filing fees and court costs. The collection of the additional fees and costs would require the adoption of a resolution authorizing the new fees and costs by the County Commissioners Court. The bill would provide county courts a means to participate even after missing the filing deadline. Payment of the salary supplement to a county court would not occur until the 60th day after the county court became entitled to collect the fee. Counties collecting the additional fees and costs under this bill could not collect the fees and costs described under Section 51.701 of the Government Code, which relates to an additional $40 filling fee that is used for court-related purposes. For each entitled county, the state would pay the salary supplement in equal monthly installments from the Judicial Fund 0573. This bill would require the Comptroller to return any fees and costs, collected under this bill and in excess of expenses, on a pro rata basis to the counties. Methodology 204 county judges receive the current salary supplement of $5,000. It is estimated that all judges receiving the $5,000 salary supplement would attempt to collect the additional $5,000 by imposing the newly established filing fee and court cost. This would cost the state $1,020,000 each fiscal year. Revenue projected to come into the Judicial Fund was estimated using case data for county courts from the Texas Judicial System Annual Report. The bill provides that excess revenue above the portion needed to pay the salary supplement would be returned to the counties on a pro rata basis. Thus, once revenue collections are sufficient to support the county judge salary supplement (assumed to occur during FY 2001), revenue gain and cost to the Judicial Fund would be equal. Information from the Comptroller of Public Accounts was used to determine revenue gain to the Judicial Fund. Information from the Office of Court Administration was used to determine cost to the Judicial Fund. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JK, PE, DG