LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 76th Regular Session April 15, 1999 TO: Honorable Tom Ramsay, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB 2214 by Olivo (Relating to the authority of a county to operate a water or sewer utility system; granting the power of eminent domain. ), Committee Report 1st House, as amended ************************************************************************** * No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. * ************************************************************************** Local Government Impact A county which would choose to acquire, own, operate, or maintain a water or sewer utility could encounter costs associated with equipment, facilities, staff, right-of-way, operating expenses, etc. Such a county would also be expected to generate revenues from a water or sewer system, which would offset costs incurred and provide a means for the county to repay debt related to a system. The net cost or benefit of such a system to a county would depend on the initial capital outlays required, operating expenses and potential revenues from system users. A county authorized by the bill to issue general obligation bonds that would choose to issue such bonds could incur costs to the county's general revenue fund. The annual cost would depend on the debt service required to repay such bonds and whether a portion of the debt service could be repaid through user fee revenue. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JK, TL, DE