LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 76th Regular Session May 11, 1999 TO: Honorable Bill Ratliff, Chair, Senate Committee on Finance FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB2371 by Gutierrez (relating to exempting diapers from the sales tax), As Engrossed ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Fundsfor * * HB2371, As Engrossed: a negative impact of $(63,527,000) through * * the biennium ending August 31, 2001, if the effective date is July * * 1, 1999; and a negative impact of $(56,009,000) through the * * biennium ending August 31, 2001, if the effective date is October * * 1, 1999. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** The following table assumes an effective date of July 1, 1999. All Funds, Five-Year Impact: *************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Probable Probable Probable * * Year Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue * * Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to * * General Revenue Cities Transit Counties/SPDs * * Fund Authorities * * 0001 * * 1999 $(2,477,000) $0 $0 $0 * * 2000 (30,243,000) (5,275,000) (2,071,000) (639,000) * * 2001 (30,807,000) (5,373,000) (2,110,000) (651,000) * * 2002 (31,399,000) (5,477,000) (2,150,000) (663,000) * * 2003 (31,974,000) (5,577,000) (2,190,000) (675,000) * * 2004 (32,540,000) (5,676,000) (2,229,000) (687,000) * *************************************************************************** The following table assumes an effective date of October 1, 1999. *************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Probable Probable Probable * * Year Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue * * Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to * * General Revenue Cities Transit Counties/SPDs * * Fund Authorities * * 0001 * * 2000 $(25,202,000) $(3,956,000) $(1,553,000) $(479,000) * * 2001 (30,807,000) (5,373,000) (2,110,000) (651,000) * * 2002 (31,399,000) (5,477,000) (2,150,000) (663,000) * * 2003 (31,974,000) (5,577,000) (2,190,000) (675,000) * * 2004 (32,540,000) (5,676,000) (2,229,000) (687,000) * *************************************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill would amend the Tax Code to exempt certain diapers from the sales tax. Diapers purchased, sold, or used by a diaper service would not be exempt from the sales tax. The governing body of a local taxing authority that imposes a local sales and use tax could repeal the proposed exemption if the governing body found that the exemption would materially impair the obligation of any contract at the time the bill went into effect and to which the local taxing authority was a party. Methodology To estimate the fiscal implications of the bill, diaper sales data were gathered from a variety of sources. The data were adjusted to reflect Texas sales only, multiplied by the state sales tax rate, and extrapolated through fiscal 2004. The fiscal impact is based on the assumption that no local taxing authorities would repeal the exemption. To the extent that one or more would repeal the exemption, the negative fiscal impact would be reduced. Local Government Impact Local units of government would have a corresponding fiscal impact from sales tax revenues, as indicated in the table above. Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JK, BB, SM