LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 76th Regular Session April 11, 1999 TO: Honorable Gary Walker, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB 3165 by Keel (Relating to annexations and water conservation and reclamation districts, including municipal utility districts.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. * ************************************************************************** Local Government Impact The bill could result in costs to a municipality in which an annexation of certain land would be determined invalid, if the land had previously been contained within a water or sewer district that was dissolved through the annexation, since the municipality would be required to: transfer back to the district all assets held by the district at the time of dissolution; pay the district an amount equal to any difference between the sales price of any assets the municipality would have sold and the value of such assets as determined by an independent appraisal, along with interest at an annual rate of six percent; and pay to the property owners in the district the amount of property taxes collected in the district, along with interest at an annual rate of six percent. The cost to a municipality would depend on the value of assets and revenues the municipality received from a district upon annexation, the amount of property taxes the municipality had collected within the former district since annexation, and the length of time between the annexation and the determination of its invalidity. Source Agencies: 582 Natural Resource Conservation Commission, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JK, DE, TL