LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 76th Regular Session April 8, 1999 TO: Honorable Toby Goodman, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB3272 by Goodman (Relating to the enforcement and collection of child support.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * HB3272, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: positive impact * * of $129,094 through the biennium ending August 31, 2001. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2000 $(19,321) * * 2001 148,415 * * 2002 148,415 * * 2003 148,415 * * 2004 148,415 * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: ************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Revenue Probable Change in Number of * * Year Gain/(Loss) from Savings/(Cost) from State Employees from * * Retained Collections Retained Collections FY 1999 * * Account in the Account in the * * General Revenue Fund General Revenue Fund * * 0001 0001 * * 2000 $341,611 $(360,932) 36.0 * * 2001 683,222 (534,807) 36.0 * * 2002 683,222 (534,807) 36.0 * * 2003 683,222 (534,807) 36.0 * * 2004 683,222 (534,807) 36.0 * ************************************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill would allow the presiding judges of the administrative judicial regions to appoint or authorize the Office of Court Administration to contract with as many as thirty-six child support court monitor to support the Title IV-D masters. The duties given to these child support court monitors, which include the referral of obligors to employment programs and the monitoring of the amount and timeliness of child support payments owed, would impact child support collections and increase the amount of collections retained by the state. Methodology The child support court monitor position is roughly equivalent to the state Child Support Officer II (B5) and Child Support Officer III (B7) classifications. Assuming the thirty-six positions authorized by the bill are split equally between the two positions, and that the B5 position would be slotted at the minimum ($24,732), while the B7 position would be slotted at the mid-range ($32,082), salary costs for fiscal year 2001 and each year thereafter would be $1,022,652 each fiscal year. Associated benefits at 27.59% of salary costs would amount to an additional $285,831 in fiscal year 2001 and each year thereafter. Fiscal year 2000 would have reduced salary and benefit costs due to a phase-in of the program for which this methodology assumes that there would be no monitors employed on September 1, 1999, and all 36 employed on August 31, 2000. This would result in a 50 percent discount to the salaries and associated benefits in fiscal year 2000 for a total cost of $654,242. It is estimated that one-time capital equipment purchases (PC's, printers, software licences) for the 36 monitors would cost $240,912 in fiscal year 2000. Using estimates provided by the Office of Court Administration, and discounting those figures as a result of program phase-in, other operational, travel and administrative costs would be $187,641 in fiscal year 2000. In fiscal year 2001 and each year thereafter, these costs would remain level at $295,938. The Title IV-D program under which these monitors would be operating is financed by a 2:1 federal-state split. As a result, the state would have costs of $360,932 in fiscal year 2000 and $534,807 each fiscal year thereafter. The Comptroller's Texas Performance Review estimates that the use of court monitors would increase the amount of child support collected for Texas children by $6,149,000. This increase would not be realized until the program was fully phased in. Assuming that one-third of the $6.1 million in increased collections will be on behalf of TANF recipients, the Office of the Attorney General will retain $683,222 (one-third of the TANF recovery remains with the state, the remaining two-thirds is returned to the federal government) in fiscal year 2001 and each year thereafter for the use of child support enforcement activities. In fiscal year 2000, the Office of the Attorney General would retain $341,611 as a result of the phase-in of the monitors. Information from the Office of Court Administration and the Office of the Attorney General was used to determine programmatic costs and associated impacts on collections. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JK, MD, DG, SC