LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 76th Regular Session March 29, 1999 TO: Honorable Toby Goodman, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB3706 by Van de Putte (Relating to the appointment and duties of associate judges and child support masters.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * The cost to the state would depend on the number of associate * * judges who would be appointed and the level of off-setting funds * * the state might be able to draw down from federal sources. * ************************************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill would amend the Family Code to provide for the appointment of associate judges for cases related to emergency procedures in suits by governmental entities and cases brought to review the placement of children under the care of the Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (DPRS). The bill would require the presiding judge of each administrative judicial region to determine which courts require the appointment of a full-time or part-time associate judge for child protective and substitute care cases, and to appoint the associate judge. The nine presiding judges of the administrative judicial regions would determine the host county of each associate judge. The host county would provide a courtroom and other necessary facilities and services. The presiding judge or judges would be able to appoint support personnel to assist the associate judges. The salaries of the associate judges would be determined by a majority vote of the presiding judges, and may not exceed 90 percent of the salary of a district judge. The associate judge's salary and the support staff salaries would be paid from county funds or from other state and federal funds as may be available. The presiding judges and the Office of Court Administration (OCA) are directed to attempt to locate available federal funding. To the extent that state and federal funds were available, some of the associate judges and staff would be considered state employees. Methodology The bill does not specify the number or location of courts and judges to be established. This estimate is based on one additional full-time associate judge being appointed and the associated costs for salary, staffing and operation. According the Office of Court Administration, if one additional full-time associate judge were appointed, the costs to the state could be $150,000 per year. This estimate includes $75,000 in salary and fringe for an associate judge; $25,000 in compensation for an assigned judge with Child Protective Services experience to hear cases, as needed, where the associate judge lacks jurisdiction or where there is a de novo appeal. For a Court Coordinator, an estimated $40,000.00 in salary and fringe would be incurred. This person may serve as both coordinator and court reporter. Equipment, supplies and travel would constitute $10,000. A personal computer or portable computer to access the judicial web page would be needed for case tracking purposes. Supplies such as stationary, electronic disks, answering machines and cellular phones would be needed for day to day operations. Travel in multi-county jurisdictions often takes over two hours per trip. This estimate does not include potential costs for salary(s) and operation the OCA might incur to administer the provisions of the bill. Local Government Impact A Local government recipient of state appropriations for a special court would have to commit to provide for courtroom space, a bailiff, an office and office furniture and other court equipment. The cost to the counties would depend on the number of associate judges that would be appointed. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JK, MD, BP