LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 76th Regular Session May 9, 1999 TO: Honorable Rene Oliveira, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: SB977 by Ratliff (relating to exemptions from ad valorem and sales and use taxation of certain timber and certain items used in timber operations and the valuation of certain timber land for ad valorem tax purposes), As Engrossed ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Fundsfor * * SB977, As Engrossed: $0 through the biennium ending August 31, * * 2001. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2000 $0 * * 2001 0 * * 2002 (15,342,000) * * 2003 (17,538,000) * * 2004 (20,644,000) * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: *************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Probable Probable Probable * * Year Savings/(Cost) Revenue Revenue Revenue * * to General Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to * * Revenue Fund School Districts Cities Counties * * 0001 * * 2000 $0 $0 $0 $0 * * 2001 0 (8,796,000) 0 (2,932,000) * * 2002 (15,342,000) (709,000) (813,000) (3,266,000) * * 2003 (17,538,000) (745,000) (1,129,000) (3,553,000) * * 2004 (20,644,000) (785,000) (1,478,000) (3,856,000) * *************************************************************************** ***************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) to * * Transit Authorities * * 2000 $0 * * 2001 0 * * 2002 (64,000) * * 2003 (89,000) * * 2004 (116,000) * ***************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill would provide for tax exclusions and exemptions by amending the property tax, sales tax, and motor vehicle sales tax chapters of the Tax Code. Methodology The fiscal impact of the exemption for standing timber and timber in the hands of the producer cannot be determined. Current property tax policy treats standing timber as part of the land; as such, it is not separately taxed. It is assumed that no change in current practice is intended and, therefore, no cost has been attached to the exemption for standing timber. Further, it is unknown how much harvested timber remains in the hands of a producer for any significant time, so the cost of this exemption is unknown. The fiscal impact of exempting implements of husbandry (timber) was taken from a previous study prepared for the Texas Forestry Association. The fiscal implications of the 50 percent exemption for timber in aesthetic management zones, critical wildlife habitat zones, or streamside management zones were developed from reported school district timber values for 1998 (assuming that 15 percent of the timber value is included in one or more of the applicable zones), reduced by 50 percent, and extrapolated through the forecast period. The fiscal impact of the 10-year 50 percent exemption for timber in newly harvested areas was estimated under the assumptions that 75 percent of the value of timber (timber not in an applicable zone) would be subject to the exemption, that timber is harvested once every 25 years and accumulating the cost by one-twenty-fifth per year. Fiscal implications would exist for the state, school districts, and counties. The implications for cities and special districts would not be significant. Although the property tax sections would take effect January 1, 2000, school districts and counties would not experience an impact until fiscal 2001. The operation of the school funding formula would shift the school district cost to the state after a one-year lag. Local Government Impact The fiscal impact to units of local government is reflected in the above table. Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JK, BB, DE, BR