LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 76th Regular Session
  
                              April 15, 1999
  
  
          TO:  Honorable J.E. "Buster" Brown, Chair, Senate Committee on
               Natural Resources
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  SB 1481 by Haywood (Relating to the appraisal of
               agricultural land for ad valorem taxation.), As Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  SB1481, As Introduced:  positive impact of $0 through the biennium    *
*  ending August 31, 2001.                                               *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2000                                   $0  *
          *       2001                                    0  *
          *       2002                         (11,502,000)  *
          *       2003                         (12,078,000)  *
          *       2004                         (12,682,000)  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal      Probable        Probable        Probable        Probable     *
* Year    Savings/(Cost)     Revenue         Revenue         Revenue      *
*           to General    Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  *
*          Revenue Fund  School Districts    Counties         Cities      *
*              0001                                                       *
*  2000                $0              $0              $0              $0 *
*  2001                 0    (11,502,000)     (3,035,000)    (11,502,000) *
*  2002      (11,502,000)       (576,000)     (3,187,000)    (12,078,000) *
*  2003      (12,078,000)       (604,000)     (3,346,000)    (12,682,000) *
*  2004      (12,682,000)       (634,000)     (3,514,000)    (13,316,000) *
***************************************************************************
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would repeal the provisions in Subchapters C and D of Chapter 23
of the Tax Code concerning interest on rollback taxes for the change of
use of agricultural land.  The annual statutory interest rate on
rollback taxes is 7 percent.
  
  
Methodology
  
The Comptroller's Property Tax Division staff used tax year 1993 reported
information from cities, counties, and school districts to estimate the
loss to local governments as a result of the bill.  1993 is the last year
taxing units reported rollback taxes collected.  The 1993 tax year
rollback tax numbers were trended upward, based on historical property
tax levy increases, to reflect estimated losses to local governments for
fiscal years 2000-04.  The total rollback loss per year for school
districts, cities, and counties was multiplied by 35 percent to reflect a
7 percent loss of interest for each of the five years of rollback tax.

Because the state school funding formula is based in part on effective
school districts tax rates, it was assumed that the loss to school
districts, due to the provisions of the bill, would be reimbursed
through the school funding formula after a one-year lag, creating a cost
to the state.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
The impact on local taxing units is reflected in the above table.
  
  
Source Agencies:   304   Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:         JK, DE, BR