Amend CSSB 980 as follows: (1) Strike added Sec. 212.131, Local Government Code, (Committee Printing page 1, lines 17-19) and substitute the following: Sec. 212.131. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter: (1) "Essential public facilities" means water, sewer, or storm drainage facilities or street improvements provided by a municipality or private utility. (2) "Residential property" is property zoned for or otherwise authorized for single-family or multi-family use. (2) Strike added Sec. 212.135, Local Government Code, (Committee Printing page 1, line 62, through page 2, line 60) and substitute the following: Sec. 212.135. JUSTIFICATION FOR MORATORIUM; WRITTEN FINDINGS REQUIRED. (a) If a municipality adopts a moratorium on property development, the moratorium is justified by demonstrating a need to prevent a shortage of essential public facilities. The municipality must issue written findings based on reasonably available information. The written findings must include a summary of: (1) evidence demonstrating the extent of need beyond the estimated capacity of existing essential public facilities that is expected to result from new property development, including identifying: (A) any essential public facilities currently operating near, at, or beyond capacity; (B) the portion of that capacity committed to the development subject to the moratorium; (C) the impact fee revenue allocated to address the facility need; and (2) evidence demonstrating that the moratorium is reasonably limited to: (A) areas of the municipality where a shortage of essential public facilities would otherwise occur; and (B) property that has not been approved for development because of the insufficiency of existing essential public facilities; (b) A moratorium that is not based on a shortage of essential public facilities is justified only by demonstrating a significant need for other public facilities, including police and fire facilities. For purposes of this subsection, a significant need for public facilities is established if the failure to provide those public facilities would result in an overcapacity of public facilities or would be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the municipality. The municipality must issue written findings based on reasonably available information. The written findings must include a summary of: (1) evidence demonstrating that applying existing development ordinances or regulations and other applicable laws is inadequate to prevent the new development from causing the overcapacity of municipal infrastructure or being detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare in an affected geographical area; (2) evidence demonstrating that alternative methods of achieving the objectives of the moratorium are unsatisfactory; and (3) evidence demonstrating that the municipality has approved a working plan and time schedule for achieving the objectives of the moratorium.