HBA-LJP C.S.H.B. 1445 77(R) BILL ANALYSIS Office of House Bill AnalysisC.S.H.B. 1445 By: Turner, Bob Land & Resource Management 3/30/2001 Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Under current law, a subdivision in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of a municipality is subject to both municipal and county development regulations. This may lead to unnecessary expenses and delays for property owners because municipalities and counties have different standards, requirements, and levels of authority over subdivisions. C.S.H.B. 1445 provides for an agreement between the county and the municipality to regulate a subdivision in the ETJ of a municipality. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the opinion of the Office of House Bill Analysis that this bill does not expressly delegate any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution. ANALYSIS C.S.H.B. 1445 amends the Local Government Code to prohibit a plat from being filed with the county clerk without the approval of the appropriate governmental entity. The bill prohibits a municipality and county from both regulating subdivisions in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the municipality. The bill requires, on or before January 1, 2002, a municipality and a county to enter into a written agreement that identifies whether the county or the municipality is authorized to regulate subdivision plats and approve related permits in the ETJ and adopt the agreement by order, ordinance, or resolution. The bill also sets forth provisions relating to the notification and the amendment of the agreement if there is any expansion or reduction in the ETJ. The bill also authorizes the municipality and the county to enter into an interlocal agreement that establishes a single governmental entity that is authorized to regulate in the ETJ, subdivisions requirements and procedures to comply with provisions relating to a plat application for the ETJ. If a municipality and a county do not enter into the agreement, the bill provides that in the ETJ of a municipality: the municipality is authorized to regulate a subdivision only if the entire area of the subdivision is included in the ETJ of the municipality when the application for the plat was filed; and the county is authorized to regulate a subdivision only if all or part of the subdivision is not included in the ETJ of the municipality when the application for the plat was filed. EFFECTIVE DATE September 1, 2001. COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE C.S.H.B. 1445 modifies the original by prohibiting a municipality and a county from both regulating subdivisions in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of a municipality and sets forth provisions relating to the agreement between the municipality and county to regulate the ETJ. The substitute authorizes a county or municipality to regulate a subdivision under an adopted agreement and sets forth provisions relating to the appropriation of the jurisdiction of the ETJ and an interlocal agreement between the county and municipality. The substitute subjects the ETJ to the same regulatory authority as the original if a county and a municipality do not have an agreement.