HBA-SEP C.S.H.B. 3632 77(R)BILL ANALYSIS Office of House Bill AnalysisC.S.H.B. 3632 By: Farabee Judicial Affairs 4/26/2001 Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Under current law, multiple filings are required in different courts to resolve multiple issues between parties. In addition, there may be a need to simplify filing and docketing procedures of certain misdemeanor cases. C.S.H.B. 3632 modifies the jurisdiction of a county court at law in Wichita County. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the opinion of the Office of House Bill Analysis that this bill does not expressly delegate any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution. ANALYSIS C.S.H.B. 3632 amends the Government Code to provide that a county court at law of Wichita County has general jurisdiction and concurrent jurisdiction with the county court in misdemeanor cases and probate and mental health matters. The bill removes provisions giving a county court at law concurrent jurisdiction with the county court in juvenile, child neglect, or dependency proceedings. All appeals from municipal courts of record, misdemeanor cases, and probate and mental health matters are required to be filed in the county court at law. A county court of law is authorized to transfer a case or certain appeals to the county court with the consent of the county judge. Except in a county that has a statutory probate court, a county court at law has concurrent jurisdiction with the district court in civil cases. A county court at law does not have jurisdiction of a case under the Alcoholic Beverage, Election, or Tax codes; a matter over which the district court has jurisdiction; or a civil case, other than a case under the Family or Texas Probate codes, in which the amount in controversy is less than the maximum amount in controversy allowed the justice court in Wichita County or more than $100,000, exclusive of punitive or exemplary damages, penalties, interest, costs, and attorney's fees. On the motion of any party, a county court at law is authorized to transfer a civil case originally filed in a county court at law that exceeds the maximum amount in controversy to the district court unless an announcement of ready for trial by all parties before a motion to transfer the case is filed confers original jurisdiction on the county court at law. A transferred case is required to be completed under the same cause number and in the same manner as if the case were originally filed in the district court. The judge of a county court at law is required to be paid an annual salary that is $1,000 less than, rather than not to exceed 90 percent of, the total annual salary received by a district judge in the county. The judge is required to be paid in installments in the same manner as other county employees rather than in monthly installments. EFFECTIVE DATE September 1, 2001. COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE C.S.H.B. 3632 modifies the original to specify that a county court at law does not have jurisdiction of a case in which the amount in controversy is less than rather than not more than the maximum amount in controversy allowed the justice court in Wichita County.