HBA-DMH C.S.S.B. 510 77(R)    BILL ANALYSIS


Office of House Bill AnalysisC.S.S.B. 510
By: Armbrister
Urban Affairs
4/10/2001
Committee Report (Substituted)



BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

Under current law, no authority exists for municipalities, counties, or
river authorities to utilize design-build procedures to provide flexibility
in constructing needed facilities and possibly save time in design and
construction. C.S.S.B. 510 authorizes governmental entities to use
design-build procedures and other alternative project delivery and
contracting methods.  

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

It is the opinion of the Office of House Bill Analysis that this bill does
not expressly delegate any additional rulemaking authority to a state
officer, department, agency, or institution. 

ANALYSIS

C.S.S.B. 510 amends the Local Government Code to authorize a governmental
entity to use any of the following methods that provides the best value for
the governmental entity when entering into a contract for the construction
of a facility: 

 _competitive bidding;

 _competitive sealed proposals for construction services;

 _a design-build contract;

 _a contract to construct, rehabilitate, alter, or repair facilities that
involves using a construction manager; or 

 _a job order contract for the minor repair, rehabilitation, or alteration
of a facility. 
 
In determining to whom to award a contract, the bill authorizes the
governmental entity to consider the purchase price, the reputation of the
vendor and of the vendor's goods or services, the quality of the vendor's
goods or services, the extent to which the goods or services meet the
governmental entity's needs, the vendor's past relationship with the
governmental entity, the impact on the ability of the governmental entity
to comply with rules relating to historically underutilized businesses, the
total long-term cost to the governmental entity to acquire the vendor's
goods or services, and any other relevant factor that a private business
entity would consider in selecting a vendor (Sec. 271.113).  

The bill provides that the governing body of a governmental entity that is
considering a construction contract using one of the specified procurement
methods other than competitive bidding must, before advertising, determine
which method provides the best value for the governmental entity. The bill
sets forth criteria and procedures for evaluating and selecting a
contractor for construction services (Secs. 271.114-271.116). 

The bill authorizes a governmental entity to use the construction
manager-agent method, the construction manager-at-risk method, or the
design-build method for the construction, rehabilitation, alteration, or
repair  of a facility. In using any of the methods and in entering into a
contract for any of the services, the bill requires the contracting
governmental entity to follow prescribed procedures (Secs.
271.117-271.119). 

The bill authorizes a governmental entity to award job order contracts for
the minor construction, repair, rehabilitation, or alteration of a facility
if the work is of a recurring nature but the delivery times are indefinite
and indefinite quantities and orders are awarded substantially on the basis
of predescribed and prepriced tasks.  The bill sets forth procedures for
executing a job order contract (Sec. 271.120). 

The bill prohibits a governmental entity, while engaged in procuring goods
or services, awarding a contract, or overseeing procurement or construction
for a public work or public  improvement, from considering whether a vendor
is a member or has another relationship with any organization and requires
the governmental entity to ensure that its bid specifications and any
subsequent contract or other agreement do not deny or diminish the right of
a person to work because of the person's membership or other relationship
status with respect to any organization (Sec. 271.121).  

The bill provides that any provision in the charter of a home-rule
municipality or any regulation of a county or river authority that requires
the use of competitive bidding or competitive sealed proposals or that
prescribes procurement procedures and that is in conflict with provisions
of the bill controls unless the governing body of the governmental entity
elects to have the provisions for alternative project delivery methods
supersede the charter or regulation. The purchasing requirements
established in provisions relating to governmental entity preferences for
recycled products apply to purchases by a governmental entity made through
an alternative project delivery method.  To the extent of any conflict, the
provisions for alternative project delivery methods prevail over any other
law relating to the purchasing of goods and services except a law relating
to contracting with historically underutilized businesses. The bill sets
forth notice requirements for bids and proposals (Sec. 271.112).   

The provisions relating to the purchasing and contracting authority of
municipalities do not apply to a municipal contract for an expenditure of
$15,000 or more if the governing body of the municipality determines that
an alternative project delivery method provides a better value for the
municipality (Sec. 252.002).   

The bill amends the Government Code to provide that the Professional
Services Procurement Act applies to a local government corporation or
another entity created by or acting on behalf of a political subdivision
(Sec. 2254.002). 

The bill amends the Education Code to require a school district or the
governing body of an institution of higher education, when using the
design-build method for a facility to designate an engineer or architect
independent of the design-build firm to act as its representative for the
duration of the work on the facility (Secs. 44.036 and 51.780). 

EFFECTIVE DATE

September 1, 2001.

COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE

C.S.S.B. 510 differs from the original bill by including a river authority
in the definition of "governmental entity" and setting forth provisions
regarding the supersession of certain regulations or provisions of a
charter of a river authority (Secs. 271.111 and 271.112).  The substitute
also modifies contract notice requirements (Sec. 271.112).  The substitute
includes among the factors that a governmental entity may consider when
awarding a contract for the construction of a facility any other relevant
factor that a private business entity would consider in selecting a vendor
(Sec 271.113). 

The substitute modifies design-build contract requirements for school
districts and institutions of higher education in the Education Code (Secs.
44.036 and 51.780).