SRC-SEW S.J.R. 46 77(R)   BILL ANALYSIS


Senate Research Center   S.J.R. 46
By: Harris
Finance
3/20/2001
As Filed


DIGEST AND PURPOSE 

Under current law, the Economic Stabilization Fund (ESF), established in
1989, receives four types of transfers.  One of these transfers involves
the unencumbered balance of the General Revenue Fund 0001.  One-half of the
uencumbered balance in Fund 0001 at the close of each biennium must be
transferred to the ESF.  Encumbrances include tax allocations yet to be
made, state agency encumbrances and accounts payable, and dedicated account
balances.  Only once has an unencumbered balance transfer been made, in
fiscal 1992.  The December 31, 2000, ESF balance was $186 million, and the
comptroller estimates that the fiscal 2001 ending balance will be $197.5
million.   

Texas has historically rated near the bottom of state rankings in its
budget stabilization fund balances as a percent of general revenue
appropriations.  This chronically low balance in the ESF is regularly
scrutinized by rating agencies and is often cited as a contributing factor
in Texas' inability to regain its AAA rating.  Regaining the top rating
could save state general obligation (GO) bond programs and borrowers over
$1 million per $100 million issued over the life of each issue.  Over the
past 13 years the state has issued in average of $254 million of GO bonds
per year.   

In addition, the amount of general revenue available to the legislature is
potentially affected by the ESF balance.  Texas has an excellent short-term
credit rating, and the interest rate that the state must pay is lower than
the interest it receives on treasury investments, thus the average general
revenue benefit is more than $50 million per year on this rate spread.
However, this rate spread would likely diminish, or could even become
negative, if the credit rating suffered.  The high rating that the state
has historically been awarded has been in part based on the large surpluses
that it has been able to demonstrate to the ratings agencies.  But in this
period of declining surpluses, the rainy day fund may be the only source of
surplus to point to in order to retain the current short-term rating and,
therefore, protect the $50 million revenue stream. 

As proposed, S.J.R. 46 requires 75 percent of any general revenue interest
and investment income in excess of the Biennial Revenue Estimate used to
certify the General Appropriations Act, excluding constitutionally
restricted funds and dedicated accounts, to be transferred to the Economic
Stabilization Fund after the end of each fiscal year. 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a
state officer, institution, or agency. 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

SECTION 1.  Amends Section 49-g, Article III, Texas Constitution, by
amending Subsections (c) and (h), and adding Subsection (e-1), as follows: 

(c) Requires the comptroller of public accounts, not later than the 90th
day of each fiscal year, to transfer from general revenue to the economic
stabilization fund the amounts prescribed by Subsection (e-1) of this
section. 
 
(e-1) Requires the comptroller,  not later than the date specified in
Subsection (c) of this section, to transfer to the economic stabilization
fund 75 percent of excess earnings. Defines "excess earnings" under this
subsection.  

  (h) Makes a conforming change.

SECTION 2.  Requires this proposed constitutional amendment to be submitted
to the voters at an election to be held November 6, 2001.  Requires the
ballot be printed to permit voting for or against the proposition:  "The
constitutional amendment providing for the transfer to the economic
stabilization fund of certain earnings received from investment of money in
the general revenue fund."