1-1     By:  Goodman, et al. (Senate Sponsor - Harris)        H.B. No. 1363
 1-2           (In the Senate - Received from the House May 4, 2001;
 1-3     May 7, 2001, read first time and referred to Committee on
 1-4     Jurisprudence; May 11, 2001, reported favorably by the following
 1-5     vote:  Yeas 5, Nays 0; May 11, 2001, sent to printer.)
 1-6                            A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 1-7                                   AN ACT
 1-8     relating to the mediation of certain disputes by collaborative law
 1-9     procedures.
1-10           BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
1-11           SECTION 1. Subchapter G, Chapter 6, Family Code, is amended
1-12     by adding Section 6.603 to read as follows:
1-13           Sec. 6.603.  COLLABORATIVE LAW. (a)  On a written agreement
1-14     of the parties and their attorneys, a dissolution of marriage
1-15     proceeding may be conducted under collaborative law procedures.
1-16           (b)  Collaborative law is a procedure in which the parties
1-17     and their counsel agree in writing to use their best efforts and
1-18     make a good faith attempt to resolve their dissolution of marriage
1-19     dispute on an agreed basis without resorting to judicial
1-20     intervention except to have the court approve the settlement
1-21     agreement, make the legal pronouncements, and sign the orders
1-22     required by law to effectuate the agreement of the parties as the
1-23     court determines appropriate.  The parties' counsel may not serve
1-24     as litigation counsel except to ask the court to approve the
1-25     settlement agreement.
1-26           (c)  A collaborative law agreement must include provisions
1-27     for:
1-28                 (1)  full and candid exchange of information between
1-29     the parties and their attorneys as necessary to make a proper
1-30     evaluation of the case;
1-31                 (2)  suspending court intervention in the dispute while
1-32     the parties are using collaborative law procedures;
1-33                 (3)  hiring experts, as jointly agreed, to be used in
1-34     the procedure;
1-35                 (4)  withdrawal of all counsel involved in the
1-36     collaborative law procedure if the collaborative law procedure does
1-37     not result in settlement of the dispute; and
1-38                 (5)  other provisions as agreed to by the parties
1-39     consistent with a good faith effort to collaboratively settle the
1-40     matter.
1-41           (d)  Notwithstanding Rule 11, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure,
1-42     or another rule or law, a party is entitled to judgment on a
1-43     collaborative law settlement agreement if the agreement:
1-44                 (1)  provides, in a prominently displayed statement
1-45     that is boldfaced, capitalized, or underlined, that the agreement
1-46     is not subject to revocation; and
1-47                 (2)  is  signed by each party to the agreement and the
1-48     attorney of each party.
1-49           (e)  Subject to Subsection (g), a court that is notified 30
1-50     days before trial that the parties are using collaborative law
1-51     procedures to attempt to settle a dispute may not, until a party
1-52     notifies the court that the collaborative law procedures did not
1-53     result in a settlement:
1-54                 (1)  set a hearing or trial in the case;
1-55                 (2)  impose discovery deadlines;
1-56                 (3)  require compliance with scheduling orders; or
1-57                 (4)  dismiss the case.
1-58           (f)  The parties shall notify the court if the collaborative
1-59     law procedures result in a settlement.  If they do not, the parties
1-60     shall file:
1-61                 (1)  a status report with the court not later than the
1-62     180th day after the date of the written agreement to use the
1-63     procedures; and
1-64                 (2)  a status report on or before the first anniversary
 2-1     of the date of the written agreement to use the procedures,
 2-2     accompanied by a motion for continuance that the court shall grant
 2-3     if the status report indicates the desire of the parties to
 2-4     continue to use collaborative law procedures.
 2-5           (g)  If the collaborative law procedures do not result in a
 2-6     settlement on or before the second anniversary of the date that the
 2-7     suit was filed, the court may:
 2-8                 (1)  set the suit for trial on the regular docket; or
 2-9                 (2)  dismiss the suit without prejudice.
2-10           SECTION 2. Subchapter A, Chapter 153, Family Code, is amended
2-11     by adding Section 153.0072 to read as follows:
2-12           Sec. 153.0072.  COLLABORATIVE LAW. (a)  On a written
2-13     agreement of the parties and their attorneys, a suit affecting the
2-14     parent-child relationship may be conducted under collaborative law
2-15     procedures.
2-16           (b)  Collaborative law is a procedure in which the parties
2-17     and their counsel agree in writing to use their best efforts and
2-18     make a good faith attempt to resolve the suit affecting the
2-19     parent-child relationship on an agreed basis without resorting to
2-20     judicial intervention except to have the court approve the
2-21     settlement agreement, make the legal pronouncements, and sign the
2-22     orders required by law to effectuate the agreement of the parties
2-23     as the court determines appropriate.  The parties' counsel may not
2-24     serve as litigation counsel except to ask the court to approve the
2-25     settlement agreement.
2-26           (c)  A collaborative law agreement must include provisions
2-27     for:
2-28                 (1)  full and candid exchange of information between
2-29     the parties and their attorneys as necessary to make a proper
2-30     evaluation of the case;
2-31                 (2)  suspending court intervention in the dispute while
2-32     the parties are using collaborative law procedures;
2-33                 (3)  hiring experts, as jointly agreed, to be used in
2-34     the procedure;
2-35                 (4)  withdrawal of all counsel involved in the
2-36     collaborative law procedure if the collaborative law procedure does
2-37     not result in settlement of the dispute; and
2-38                 (5)  other provisions as agreed to by the parties
2-39     consistent with a good faith effort to collaboratively settle the
2-40     matter.
2-41           (d)  Notwithstanding Rule 11, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure,
2-42     or another rule or law, a party is entitled to judgment on a
2-43     collaborative law settlement agreement if the agreement:
2-44                 (1)  provides, in a prominently displayed statement
2-45     that is boldfaced, capitalized, or underlined, that the agreement
2-46     is not subject to revocation; and
2-47                 (2)  is  signed by each party to the agreement and the
2-48     attorney of each party.
2-49           (e)  Subject to Subsection (g), a court that is notified 30
2-50     days before trial that the parties are using collaborative law
2-51     procedures to attempt to settle a dispute may not, until a party
2-52     notifies the court that the collaborative law procedures did not
2-53     result in a settlement:
2-54                 (1)  set a hearing or trial in the case;
2-55                 (2)  impose discovery deadlines;
2-56                 (3)  require compliance with scheduling orders; or
2-57                 (4)  dismiss the case.
2-58           (f)  The parties shall notify the court if the collaborative
2-59     law procedures result in a settlement.  If they do not, the parties
2-60     shall file:
2-61                 (1)  a status report with the court not later than the
2-62     180th day after the date of the written agreement to use the
2-63     procedures; and
2-64                 (2)  a status report on or before the first anniversary
2-65     of the date of the written agreement to use the procedures,
2-66     accompanied by a motion for continuance that the court shall grant
2-67     if the status report indicates the desire of the parties to
2-68     continue to use collaborative law procedures.
2-69           (g)  If the collaborative law procedures do not result in a
 3-1     settlement on or before the second anniversary of the date that the
 3-2     suit was filed, the court may:
 3-3                 (1)  set the suit for trial on the regular docket; or
 3-4                 (2)  dismiss the suit without prejudice.
 3-5           SECTION 3. (a)  This Act takes effect September 1, 2001.
 3-6           (b)  This Act applies only to an action commenced:
 3-7                 (1)  on or after the effective date of this Act; or
 3-8                 (2)  before the effective date of this Act if the trial
 3-9     in the action has not begun before the effective date of this Act.
3-10                                  * * * * *