By Hochberg                                           H.B. No. 3584
         Line and page numbers may not match official copy.
         Bill not drafted by TLC or Senate E&E.
                                A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 1-1                                   AN ACT
 1-2     relating to the monitoring and regulation of air pollution
 1-3     emissions upsets or accidents; providing civil and administrative
 1-4     penalties.
 1-5           BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 1-6           SECTION 1. Subchapter B, Chapter 382, Health and Safety Code,
 1-7     is amended by adding Section 382.0215 to read as follows:
 1-8           Sec. 382.0215.  UNAUTHORIZED EMISSIONS RELATED TO ACCIDENTS,
 1-9     UPSETS, OR MAINTENANCE. (a)  A facility shall report to the
1-10     commission each air pollutant emission caused by a sudden,
1-11     unavoidable event that results from an accident, upset, or
1-12     maintenance, including a cause beyond the control of the operator
1-13     of the facility.  A report under this subsection must be
1-14     accompanied by:
1-15                 (1)  a fee in an amount determined by the commission to
1-16     be adequate to pay the costs of maintaining records related to the
1-17     reports submitted under this subsection, investigations, and any
1-18     upset monitoring program to detect upset and accident events that
1-19     result from those reports, including the pilot project set forth in
1-20     Section 382.0216(a) of this section, and
1-21                 (2)  a technical analysis of the emissions event, if
1-22     required by Subsection (c) to be performed.
1-23           (b)  A permitted facility shall install and operate a
 2-1     continuous measurement and monitoring system to detect and document
 2-2     the occurrence of each emissions event described by Subsection (a).
 2-3     The device must be able to establish the amount of each pollutant
 2-4     released.
 2-5           (c)  A facility shall perform a technical analysis of each
 2-6     emissions event described by Subsection (a) that exceeds a
 2-7     threshold established by commission rule. The analysis must
 2-8     identify the probable cause of the emissions event, preventive
 2-9     measures that can prevent the recurrence of such an event, and an
2-10     evaluation of the technical feasibility and cost-effectiveness of
2-11     control devices necessary to mitigate the effects of such an event.
2-12     The facility shall include in the analysis an action plan to
2-13     minimize future unauthorized emissions events.  The action plan
2-14     must conform to demonstrated, source-specific, industrial best
2-15     practices.
2-16           (d)  A facility required to provide an action plan under
2-17     Subsection (c) shall implement the plan if the plan is approved by
2-18     the commission.
2-19           (e)  The commission by rule may require a permitted facility
2-20     to acquire emissions credits to offset emissions events described
2-21     by Subsection (a) providing that the acquisition is consistent with
2-22     the state implementation program.
2-23           (f)  The commission shall establish by rule and shall include
2-24     in permit conditions:
2-25                 (1)  the maximum number of emissions events described
2-26     by Subsection (a) that may occur in a year before the commission
 3-1     may take action to revoke the facility's permit or another
 3-2     enforcement action; and
 3-3                 (2)  the maximum volume of emissions events described
 3-4     by Subsection (a), expressed in terms of a percentage of permitted
 3-5     emissions, that may occur in a year before the commission may take
 3-6     action to revoke the facility's permit or another enforcement
 3-7     action.
 3-8           (g)  The commission shall enforce rules concerning emissions
 3-9     events described by Subsection (a) by means of civil or
3-10     administrative penalties or by injunctive relief as provided by
3-11     Chapter 7, Water Code.  The commission may not exempt excess
3-12     emission described by Subsection (a) from penalties or injunctive
3-13     relief.  The commission may exercise enforcement discretion in
3-14     consideration of the unavoidable nature of any excess emissions
3-15     described by Subsection (a).
3-16           (h)  The commission shall develop and implement policies to
3-17     limit the cumulative effects of emissions from maintenance,
3-18     startups, and shutdowns of facilities.
3-19           SECTION 2. Subchapter B, Chapter 382, Health and Safety Code,
3-20     is amended by adding Section 382.0216 to read as follows:
3-21           (a)  The commission shall conduct a pilot project, designed
3-22     by the commission, using aircraft-borne monitoring devices to
3-23     detect unauthorized air pollutant emissions events from permitted
3-24     facilities.  The commission shall report to the 79th Legislature on
3-25     the results of the pilot project and include with the report
3-26     recommendations regarding the use of aircraft-borne monitoring
 4-1     devices as a component of an air pollutant emissions enforcement
 4-2     strategy.  The pilot project is funded by a fee of $200 imposed by
 4-3     the commission on each reportable upset as defined by 30 T.A.C.
 4-4     Section 101.1 (82).
 4-5           (b)  This section expires September 1, 2005.
 4-6           SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2001.