By Thompson H.C.R. No. 203
Line and page numbers may not match official copy.
Bill not drafted by TLC or Senate E&E.
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
1-1 WHEREAS, RFD & ASSOCIATES, INC. alleges that:
1-2 (1) On August 10, 1998, the Office of the Attorney General
1-3 of the State of Texas awarded RFD & Associates, Inc., a contract
1-4 for design, development, testing and implementation of a legal case
1-5 management system; and
1-6 (2) That RFD and Associates, Inc., worked in good faith and
1-7 substantially complied with the terms and specifications of the
1-8 contract; and
1-9 (3) On February 25, 1999, the Office of the Attorney General
1-10 granted an extension of the original contract, both as to the
1-11 amounts payable under the contract and as to the time of
1-12 completion, due to the desire of the Office of the Attorney General
1-13 to make changes in the system it had originally requested; and
1-14 (4) Following this extension of the original contract, the
1-15 Office of the Attorney General repeatedly requested additional
1-16 changes in the system's design and such changes were agreed to and
1-17 made in good faith by RFD & Associates, Inc.; and
1-18 (4) The Office of the Attorney General agreed in writing to
1-19 pay additional amounts for the desired system changes; and
1-20 (5) After RFD & Associates, Inc., substantially performed as
1-21 directed under the terms of the contract, the Office of the
1-22 Attorney General unilaterally terminated the process of testing the
1-23 system that had been made part of the contract; and
2-1 (6) The Office of the Attorney General refused to pay the
2-2 amounts due and owing RFD & Associates, Inc., under the contract,
2-3 including the amount or fair market value of the orders or requests
2-4 for additional work made by the Office of the Attorney General; and
2-5 (7) That by its actions the Office of the Attorney General
2-6 has breached the contract; now, therefore, be it
2-7 RESOLVED, by the Legislature of the State of Texas, That RFD
2-8 & Associates, Inc., is granted permission to sue the State of Texas
2-9 and the Office of Attorney General subject to Chapter 107, Civil
2-10 Practices and Remedies Code; and be it further
2-11 RESOLVED, That the Attorney General of the State of Texas be
2-12 served process as provided by Chapter 107, Civil Practice and
2-13 Remedies Code; and be it further
2-14 RESOLVED, That the Legislature of the State of Texas did not
2-15 intend by the enactment of Chapter 2260, Government Code, to divest
2-16 future legislatures of the authority to consider and deny or grant
2-17 consents to suit under Chapter 107 of the Texas Civil Practices &
2-18 Remedies Code, irrespective of compliance with Chapter 2260, and
2-19 the Legislature of the State of Texas specifically reserves such
2-20 authority to itself.