By Thompson H.C.R. No. 203 Line and page numbers may not match official copy. Bill not drafted by TLC or Senate E&E. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 1-1 WHEREAS, RFD & ASSOCIATES, INC. alleges that: 1-2 (1) On August 10, 1998, the Office of the Attorney General 1-3 of the State of Texas awarded RFD & Associates, Inc., a contract 1-4 for design, development, testing and implementation of a legal case 1-5 management system; and 1-6 (2) That RFD and Associates, Inc., worked in good faith and 1-7 substantially complied with the terms and specifications of the 1-8 contract; and 1-9 (3) On February 25, 1999, the Office of the Attorney General 1-10 granted an extension of the original contract, both as to the 1-11 amounts payable under the contract and as to the time of 1-12 completion, due to the desire of the Office of the Attorney General 1-13 to make changes in the system it had originally requested; and 1-14 (4) Following this extension of the original contract, the 1-15 Office of the Attorney General repeatedly requested additional 1-16 changes in the system's design and such changes were agreed to and 1-17 made in good faith by RFD & Associates, Inc.; and 1-18 (4) The Office of the Attorney General agreed in writing to 1-19 pay additional amounts for the desired system changes; and 1-20 (5) After RFD & Associates, Inc., substantially performed as 1-21 directed under the terms of the contract, the Office of the 1-22 Attorney General unilaterally terminated the process of testing the 1-23 system that had been made part of the contract; and 2-1 (6) The Office of the Attorney General refused to pay the 2-2 amounts due and owing RFD & Associates, Inc., under the contract, 2-3 including the amount or fair market value of the orders or requests 2-4 for additional work made by the Office of the Attorney General; and 2-5 (7) That by its actions the Office of the Attorney General 2-6 has breached the contract; now, therefore, be it 2-7 RESOLVED, by the Legislature of the State of Texas, That RFD 2-8 & Associates, Inc., is granted permission to sue the State of Texas 2-9 and the Office of Attorney General subject to Chapter 107, Civil 2-10 Practices and Remedies Code; and be it further 2-11 RESOLVED, That the Attorney General of the State of Texas be 2-12 served process as provided by Chapter 107, Civil Practice and 2-13 Remedies Code; and be it further 2-14 RESOLVED, That the Legislature of the State of Texas did not 2-15 intend by the enactment of Chapter 2260, Government Code, to divest 2-16 future legislatures of the authority to consider and deny or grant 2-17 consents to suit under Chapter 107 of the Texas Civil Practices & 2-18 Remedies Code, irrespective of compliance with Chapter 2260, and 2-19 the Legislature of the State of Texas specifically reserves such 2-20 authority to itself.