By Martinez Fischer H.C.R. No. 208 2001S0811/1 HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 1-1 WHEREAS, Carmen R. Melenyzer, individually and as next friend 1-2 of Russell Glen Melenyzer, a child, alleges that: 1-3 (1) Carmen R. Melenyzer, (hereinafter "Melenyzer"), is a 1-4 person for whom the Office of the Attorney General of the State of 1-5 Texas, (hereinafter "OAGTX") by and through its agents, employees 1-6 and functionaries, including the child support division of the 1-7 Office of the Attorney General collect child support payable to her 1-8 at some central collection site, believed to be in Austin, Texas, 1-9 and then pays the collected child support to her in San Antonio, 1-10 Bexar County, Texas; 1-11 (2) On and after the entry of a corrected decree of divorce 1-12 on June 7, 1989, at the direction of the OAGTX, all of Melenyzer's 1-13 child support payments have been paid through the OAGTX; 1-14 (3) Charles L. Melenyzer, (hereinafter "obligor"), being an 1-15 out-of-state resident, was, for this additional reason, necessarily 1-16 required to make all of his child support payments through the 1-17 OAGTX; 1-18 (4) The OAGTX and the Attorney General of the State of 1-19 Texas, pursuant to their statutory duty, both state and federal, to 1-20 preserve and protect the rights of the children of Texas, and, in 1-21 particular the child, Russell Glen Melenyzer, (hereinafter "the 1-22 child"), have expressly assumed the exclusive right to receive and 1-23 collect monthly court-ordered child support payments for many of 1-24 the children in Texas for whom child support is payable, but, in 1-25 any event, have expressly assumed the exclusive right to receive 2-1 and collect child support payable by the obligor to Melenyzer for 2-2 and on behalf of the child. That is, Melenyzer has no choice but 2-3 to allow the OAGTX and the Texas Attorney General to collect child 2-4 support payable to her; 2-5 (5) Melenyzer, relying upon the authority and duty of the 2-6 OAGTX and the Texas Attorney General to collect the monthly 2-7 court-ordered child support payments to which she and the child had 2-8 a legal right, necessarily deferred to their assumption of 2-9 exclusivity in this arena, all to her detriment and, more 2-10 especially, that of the child; 2-11 (6) Melenyzer, again under the pre-eminence of the position 2-12 of the OAGTX in the area of collection of child support, has also 2-13 necessarily been required to rely upon the OAGTX to forward to her, 2-14 for the use and benefit of the child, any and all child support 2-15 payments received by the OAGTX from obligor with respect to the 2-16 child, whether ordered or not, whether in excess of the 2-17 "court-ordered" amount or not; 2-18 (7) The OAGTX has been receiving from obligor, father of the 2-19 child, the sum of $83.00 per month for an extended period of time; 2-20 (8) Although the OAGTX has a fiduciary duty to Melenyzer, 2-21 but more especially to the child, to promptly record the receipt of 2-22 the child support payments and forward such payments to the 2-23 designated recipient, that is, Melenyzer, it has not; 2-24 (9) The OAGTX, based upon the information and belief of 2-25 Melenyzer, as well as upon the representations or admissions of the 2-26 employees and agents of the OAGTX, all of whom were then acting in 3-1 the ordinary course and scope of their employment, has been, since 3-2 on or about October, 1999, and is currently routinely breaching its 3-3 fiduciary duty to Melenyzer and the child by arbitrarily 3-4 withholding or returning to the obligor, (or otherwise disposing of 3-5 the funds referenced herein), one-half or more of each monthly 3-6 payment made by obligor to Melenyzer for the support of the child 3-7 through the OAGTX, which payment is made in accordance with the 3-8 applicable order in the underlying case, being Cause No. 3-9 85-CI-04159, styled In the Interest of Russell Glen Melenyzer, A 3-10 Child; 3-11 (10) On or about October, 1999, Melenyzer began to receive 3-12 less than the meager $83.00 she had previously been being paid by 3-13 obligor through the OAGTX. Although no other order had been 3-14 entered and although obligor was still making monthly payments of 3-15 $83.00 each month, the OAGTX, for some unknown and inexplicable 3-16 reason, began withholding monies from Melenyzer that were rightly 3-17 paid by obligor to her for the use and benefit of the child; the 3-18 OAGTX has, since that time, withheld from Melenyzer the sum of at 3-19 least $41.50 each month through on or about May, 2000, when the 3-20 OAGTX began to again pay Melenyzer the entire amount received by 3-21 the OAGTX and payable to Melenyzer; however, prior to that time, 3-22 especially in some recent months, the OAGTX or the Texas Attorney 3-23 General has arbitrarily withheld more than one-half of the child 3-24 payment received by the OAGTX from the obligor for the use and 3-25 benefit of the child; 3-26 (11) In this regard, and by way of explanation, the OAGTX 4-1 receives a check or other payment from the obligor, deposits that 4-2 check into the treasury of the State of Texas, (child support trust 4-3 fund), into which all child support checks from all obligors are 4-4 presumably deposited, and then sends Melenyzer, (and presumably all 4-5 other obligees who receive their child support payments through and 4-6 from the OAGTX), a new check drawn on The State of Texas; 4-7 (12) When Melenyzer sought to learn the reason for the 4-8 wrongful confiscation or conversion of Melenyzer's child support 4-9 money by the OAGTX, she was advised that the monies were being 4-10 withheld to repay a some unknown and undefined debt to the State of 4-11 Texas in the sum of $10,000.00; although she has requested an 4-12 explanation on several occasions, each inquiry is met with a 4-13 different and, often, more ludicrous reason or supposed 4-14 explanation; at no time, however, has she been provided with an 4-15 accounting of the supposed account that she owes to the State of 4-16 Texas, although an accounting has been verbally requested on 4-17 several occasions from several different employees and agents of 4-18 the OAGTX; neither the State of Texas, the Texas Attorney General, 4-19 the OAGTX, or any other agency of the State of Texas has sent 4-20 Melenyzer a statement or bill for any sum at any time indicating 4-21 that she owes the State of Texas, the Texas Attorney General, the 4-22 OAGTX, or any other person the sum of $10,000.00, much less any 4-23 other sum; 4-24 (13) Without actual or constructive notice to Melenyzer of a 4-25 hearing on this issue of her indebtedness--although such an 4-26 indebtedness is expressly denied--much less without affording 5-1 Melenyzer a hearing at which to present evidence in her defense, 5-2 the OAGTX, in violation of Melenyzer's civil rights, began paying 5-3 Melenyzer--and the child--one-half of the sum paid by obligor; 5-4 (14) Although the OAGTX continues to receive the sum of 5-5 $83.00 each month from obligor for the use and benefit of Melenyzer 5-6 and the Child, the OAGTX has made reduced payments from the child 5-7 support trust fund to Melenyzer of $41.50 per month rather than the 5-8 full $83.00 per month paid by obligor through the OAGTX; as such, 5-9 the OAGTX and Attorney General John Cornyn have breached the 5-10 fiduciary duty the State of Texas, by and through the Texas 5-11 Attorney General and the OAGTX owe Melenyzer and the child in 5-12 wrongfully converting or confiscating without lawful order monies 5-13 owed to one of the children for whom the OAGTX and Attorney General 5-14 John Cornyn purportedly are collecting child support money in 5-15 accordance with their statutory charge; 5-16 (15) The OAGTX and Attorney General John Cornyn are liable 5-17 to Melenyzer and the child for actual damages for their gross 5-18 breach of their fiduciary duty to Melenyzer and the child in an 5-19 amount yet to be determined since the OAGTX refuses to provide 5-20 Melenyzer with an accounting of the monies received, withheld and 5-21 paid, and, in particular, the reasons for withholding the 5-22 confiscated child support; 5-23 (16) The OAGTX and Attorney General John Cornyn are liable 5-24 to Melenyzer and the child for actual damages for unlawfully and 5-25 without any legal authorization to do so, confiscating and 5-26 misdirecting monies due and payable to Melenyzer for the use and 6-1 benefit of the child in an amount yet to be determined due to the 6-2 refusal of the OAGTX to provide Melenyzer with an accounting; 6-3 (17) Melenyzer requests declaratory relief to authorize a 6-4 court to find that the acts and omissions of the OAGTX as alleged 6-5 hereinabove be declared invalid and in contravention of its 6-6 fiduciary, statutory, or constitutional duty to Melenyzer and the 6-7 child, as well as the people of Texas; 6-8 (18) In addition to the above, the OAGTX has supplied false 6-9 and incorrect information about Melenyzer's entitlement to receive 6-10 child support and the amount of child support she is receiving that 6-11 caused Melenyzer to be denied Medicaid for and on behalf of her 6-12 father when she made a claim for the payment by the agency involved 6-13 of some of the medical bills incurred by her father in 1999; 6-14 (19) This request for permission to sue the OAGTX is 6-15 necessary in that Melenyzer filed suit against the OAGTX in Cause 6-16 No. 2000-CI-07323, styled Carmen R. Melenyzer, Individually and As 6-17 Next Friend of Russell Glen Melenyzer, A Child v. John Cornyn, 6-18 Attorney General of the State of Texas, in his representative 6-19 capacity, and the Office of the Attorney General of The State of 6-20 Texas, Child Support Division, in the District Court for the 285th 6-21 Judicial District of Bexar County, Texas and, to prevent the OAGTX 6-22 from obtaining a dismissal with prejudice based upon its claim of 6-23 sovereign immunity, was required to take a non-suit of that 6-24 lawsuit; 6-25 (20) This suit should be authorized to be brought in the 6-26 county of the residence of Melenyzer, that is, Bexar County, Texas; 7-1 and, 7-2 (21) This suit should authorize Melenyzer, who necessarily 7-3 was required to retain legal counsel to attempt to protect her 7-4 civil rights as referenced hereinabove, to further recover the 7-5 reasonable and necessary attorney's fees rendered and to be 7-6 rendered and costs of court incurred or to be incurred on her 7-7 behalf and that of the child in filing and prosecuting the suit in 7-8 Cause No. 2000-CI-07323, referenced above, but in any future legal 7-9 proceeding authorized by this resolution, and as otherwise 7-10 authorized or provided by the Texas Family Code; now, therefore, be 7-11 it 7-12 RESOLVED by the Legislature of the State of Texas, That 7-13 Carmen R. Melenyzer, individually and as next friend of Russell 7-14 Glen Melenyzer, a child, or any other person who may hereafter be 7-15 appointed by the Court to act for or on behalf of the child, 7-16 Russell Glen Melenyzer, are granted permission to sue the State of 7-17 Texas and John Cornyn, Attorney General of the State of Texas, in 7-18 his representative capacity, and the Office of the Attorney General 7-19 of The State of Texas, Child Support Division subject to Chapter 7-20 107, Civil Practice and Remedies Code; and, be it further 7-21 RESOLVED, That the suit authorized by this resolution shall 7-22 be brought in Bexar County; and, be it further 7-23 RESOLVED, That John Cornyn, Attorney General of the State of 7-24 Texas, in his representative capacity and the director of the child 7-25 support division of the attorney general's office be served process 7-26 as provided by Subdivision (3), Subsection (a), Section 107.002, 8-1 Civil Practice and Remedies Code.