LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                              March 5, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable Elliott Naishtat, Chair, House Committee on
               Human Services
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  HB43  by McClendon (Relating to the consideration of
               income earned by certain recipients of Temporary
               Assistance for Needy Families benefits for eligibility
               determination purposes.), As Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  HB43, As Introduced:  negative impact of $(25,966,348) through the    *
*  biennium ending August 31, 2003.                                      *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2002                        $(12,000,550)  *
          *       2003                         (13,965,798)  *
          *       2004                         (15,548,340)  *
          *       2005                         (15,454,969)  *
          *       2006                         (15,801,281)  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
**************************************************************************
*Fiscal        Probable             Probable             Probable        *
* Year    Savings/(Cost) from  Savings/(Cost) from  Savings/(Cost) from  *
*        GR MOE for Temporary     GR Match for        Federal Funds -    *
*        Assistance for Needy       Medicaid              Federal        *
*              Families               0758                 0555          *
*                0759                                                    *
*  2002          $(11,758,895)           $(241,655)           $(365,519) *
*  2003           (13,656,360)            (309,438)            (464,707) *
*  2004           (15,238,688)            (309,652)            (465,834) *
*  2005           (15,145,045)            (309,924)            (466,245) *
*  2006           (15,491,084)            (310,197)            (466,656) *
**************************************************************************
  
Given the limited availability of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
(TANF) federal funds, for the purpose of this fiscal note General
Revenue is assumed as the method of financing.  Should additional TANF
federal funds become available, $11,758,895 in FY 2002 and $13,656,360 in
FY 2003 of General Revenue costs assumed above could be financed with
TANF federal funds.
  
Technology Impact
  
An estimated $214,500 for 1,950 hours of programming would be required by
the Department of Human Services (DHS) to implement the provisions of
the bill.
  
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill adds a new Section 31.0038 to the Human Resources Code and
repeals Section 31.043.  The bill requires DHS to exclude all earned
income in excess of $120 (the work-related expense deduction) for a
recipient of TANF, rather than the current 90% disregard, when
determining eligibility and benefits.  The time period of the earned
income disregard is extended from the current four months to six months.
The department may not disregard earned income of a recipient who left
employment voluntarily without good cause while receiving financial
assistance, and the department may not exempt any recipient from
participating in work or employment activities during the period of the
disregard.  The bill is effective September 1, 2001.
  
  
Methodology
  
The impact of increasing the earned income disregard from 90% to 100% was
estimated by subtracting the average grant per case from the maximum
grant.  It was assumed that the number of clients receiving the earned
income disregard increases 8% in FY 2002 and 25.3% in FY 2003, remaining
level through FY 2006.  A retention factor was applied over the period of
the earned income disregard, reflecting current experience of 32.2% of
clients remaining on the caseload through the fourth month.

In addition to the increase for cash assistance, it was assumed that
clients would receive an additional two months of child care at $16.21
per day for 43.5 days.  It was also assumed that the client would receive
an additional two months of CHOICES services at $178.83 per month.

Extending the disregard by two months provides clients two additional
months of Medicaid coverage.  Medicaid costs reflect insured services,
cost-reimbursed services, vendor drug and medical transportation.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
  
  
Source Agencies:   324   Texas Department of Human Services, 501   Texas
                   Department of Health, 320   Texas Workforce Commission
LBB Staff:         JK, HD, KE