LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                               May 15, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable James E. "Pete" Laney, Speaker of the House,
               House of Representatives
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  HB102  by Maxey (Relating to the electronic imaging
               program of the Texas Department of Human Services.), As
               Passed 2nd House
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Fundsfor     *
*  HB102, As Passed 2nd House:  positive impact of $2,954,822 for an     *
*  immediate effective date, and a positive impact of $2,666,278 for     *
*  a September 1, 2001, effective date through the biennium ending       *
*  August 31, 2003.                                                      *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
All Funds, Six-Year Impact:
  
**************************************************************************
*Fiscal        Probable             Probable        Change in Number of  *
* Year    Savings/(Cost) from  Savings/(Cost) from State Employees from  *
*        General Revenue Fund    Federal Funds -          FY 2001        *
*                0001                Federal                             *
*                                     0555                               *
*  2001               $378,026             $457,390                (0.3) *
*  2002              1,422,621            1,721,292                (1.0) *
*  2003              1,154,175            1,396,488                (1.0) *
*  2004              1,154,175            1,396,488                (1.0) *
*  2005              1,154,175            1,396,488                (1.0) *
*  2006              1,154,175            1,396,488                (1.0) *
**************************************************************************
  
The table above shows an immediate effective date.

All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
The table below shows a September 1, 2001, effective date.
  
**************************************************************************
*Fiscal        Probable             Probable        Change in Number of  *
* Year    Savings/(Cost) from  Savings/(Cost) from State Employees from  *
*        General Revenue Fund    Federal Funds -          FY 2000        *
*                0001                Federal                             *
*                                     0555                               *
*  2002             $1,512,103           $1,829,560                (1.0) *
*  2003              1,154,175            1,396,488                (1.0) *
*  2004              1,154,175            1,396,488                (1.0) *
*  2005              1,154,175            1,396,488                (1.0) *
*  2006              1,154,175            1,396,488                (1.0) *
**************************************************************************
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would repeal Section 31.0325, Human Resources Code which
authorized the Department of Human Services (DHS) to implement a finger
imaging program for applicants and for recipients in conjunction with
the electronic benefits program. The bill includes a provision allowing
for immediate effect. Should the bill not have immediate effect the
effective date would become September 1, 2001.
  
  
Methodology
  
DHS currently contracts for finger imaging services at the time of a
client's application for services. This contract expires at the end of
April 2001. The agency indicated that the contract contains a provision
that the contract must be terminated if a required appropriation is not
made. The abolishment of a particular program may not automatically
cancel the State's financial obligations under existing contracts,
despite the "funding-out" clause. DHS indicated that additional direction
or specific prohibition in the General Appropriations Act to expend any
funds for an electronic imaging program previously authorized by Sec.
31.0325, Texas Human Resources Code, other than for normal shut down
costs would provide additional authority.

Savings are assumed to come primarily from elimination of payments to the
contractor.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
  
  
Source Agencies:   324   Texas Department of Human Services
LBB Staff:         JK, HD, KF, ML