LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session February 5, 2001 TO: Honorable Irma Rangel, Chair, House Committee on Higher Education FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB125 by West, George "Buddy" (Relating to abolishing the Texas Academic Skills Program.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * HB125, As Introduced: positive impact of $18,496,000 through the * * biennium ending August 31, 2003. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2002 $9,248,000 * * 2003 9,248,000 * * 2004 9,248,000 * * 2005 9,248,000 * * 2006 9,248,000 * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: ***************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) from * * General Revenue Fund * * 0001 * * 2002 $9,248,000 * * 2003 9,248,000 * * 2004 9,248,000 * * 2005 9,248,000 * * 2006 9,248,000 * ***************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill abolishes the Texas Academic Skills Program (TASP) and the requirement that students failing the TASP must participate in developmental education. Methodology Although the bill abolishes TASP, developmental education would still be undertaken because of the requirements of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). Because TASP requirements are more stringent than SACS, elimination of TASP could be expected to result in a reduction in developmental education of about 10 percent. Currently $91,500,000 is spent each year for formula funded developmental education; a ten percent reduction would translate into a savings of $9,150,000. No change in the number of personnel is expected. Annual funding ($98,000) appropriated for test fee waivers for needy students would no longer be necessary. Funds are currently appropriated to the Coordinating Board to fund the Developmental Education performance fund. It is assumed that an alternative testing mechanism would be used to measure student progress in developmental education for the allocation of these funds, so no savings would be realized in this area. Local Government Impact Community college districts supplementing state funding for developmental education and administering the TASP program with local funds could realize a corresponding ten percent annual savings. Source Agencies: 781 Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board LBB Staff: JK, CT, DB