LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                             February 1, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable Rene Oliveira, Chair, House Committee on Ways &
               Means
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  HB294  by Thompson (Relating to exempting gun safes from
               the sales tax.), As Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  HB294, As Introduced: a negative impact of $(626,000) through the     *
*  biennium ending August 31, 2003, if the effective date of the bill    *
*  is July 1, 2001; and a negative impact of $(552,000) through the      *
*  biennium ending August 31, 2003, if the effective date of the bill    *
*  is October 1, 2001.                                                   *
**************************************************************************
  
The following table assumes an effective date of July 1, 2001:
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal      Probable        Probable        Probable        Probable     *
* Year       Revenue         Revenue         Revenue         Revenue      *
*         Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  *
*        General Revenue      Cities         Transit      Counties/SPDs   *
*              Fund                        Authorities                    *
*              0001                                                       *
*  2001         $(24,000)              $0              $0              $0 *
*  2002         (297,000)        (54,000)        (21,000)         (6,000) *
*  2003         (305,000)        (55,000)        (21,000)         (7,000) *
*  2004         (313,000)        (57,000)        (22,000)         (7,000) *
*  2005         (321,000)        (58,000)        (22,000)         (7,000) *
*  2006         (330,000)        (60,000)        (23,000)         (7,000) *
***************************************************************************
  
The following table assumes an effective date of October 1, 2001:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal      Probable        Probable        Probable        Probable     *
* Year       Revenue         Revenue         Revenue         Revenue      *
*         Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  *
*        General Revenue      Cities         Transit      Counties/SPDs   *
*              Fund                        Authorities                    *
*              0001                                                       *
*  2002        $(247,000)       $(40,000)       $(15,000)        $(5,000) *
*  2003         (305,000)        (55,000)        (21,000)         (7,000) *
*  2004         (313,000)        (57,000)        (22,000)         (7,000) *
*  2005         (321,000)        (58,000)        (22,000)         (7,000) *
*  2006         (330,000)        (60,000)        (23,000)         (7,000) *
***************************************************************************
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would amend Chapter 151 of the Tax Code to exempt gun safes from
the sales and use tax.

Exempted would be enclosures specifically designed or modified for the
purpose of storing a firearm and equipped with a locking device, such as
a padlock or key lock.

The bill would take effect July 1, 2001 if it were to receive the
requisite two-thirds majority votes in both houses of the Legislature.
Otherwise, it would take effect October 1, 2001.
  
  
Methodology
  
The fiscal implications of exempting gun safes from the sales tax were
estimated using a variety of data, both public and private.  Estimated
sales of gun safes in Texas were multiplied by the state sales tax rate,
adjusted for the effective date, and projected through fiscal 2006.
Fiscal implications to units of local government were estimated
proportionally.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
Local units of government would have a corresponding fiscal impact from
sales tax revenues, as indicated in the table above.
  
  
Source Agencies:   304   Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:         JK, SD, SM