LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session February 28, 2001 TO: Honorable Gary Walker, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB377 by Turner, Bob (Relating to permitting the value of natural resources to be included in the assessment of damages in a condemnation proceeding in certain circumstances.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted ************************************************************************** * No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. * ************************************************************************** Local Government Impact If a political subdivision has filed a petition under Chapter 21 of the Property Code for the condemnation of property and states in the petition that the intended purpose for acquiring the property is to use the natural resources on or under the property, the bill would require that the local market value of the natural resources be considered in addition to the local market value of the land when assessing damages to the property owner. The bill would also prevent the appraised value of natural resources on or under the land from being considered for property tax appraisal purposes or for subjecting condemned real property to additional taxes. The Act would take effect September 1, 2001, but would not affect litigation pending prior to that date. The provisions of the bill would result in an increased cost to the political subdivision in property condemnation cases in which natural resources are intended to be used by the subdivision. The local government entity would incur the costs of conducting land surveys to determine the value of the natural resources and would have to pay higher damages to the property owner than under current statute. The land surveys are estimated to cost $750 each. It is anticipated that most natural resources on condemned property would not have an exceptionally high market value; however, the additional costs of paying the property owner for natural resources could be significant if the land contains substantial and high-valued natural resources. For example, a natural gas asset could be valued starting at approximately $330,000. Source Agencies: 302 Office of the Attorney General, 601 Texas Department of Transportation, 305 General Land Office, 455 Railroad Commission of Texas LBB Staff: JK, CL, DB, MW