LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session February 13, 2001 TO: Honorable Bill G. Carter, Chair, House Committee on Urban Affairs FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB693 by Bosse (Relating to the creation, powers, and boundaries of certain municipal development districts.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. * ************************************************************************** Local Government Impact The bill would remove the population cap that determines applicability of Chapter 377, Local Government Code to municipalities. The statute would be applicable to all municipalities located in more than one county and would allow for an election to create a municipal development district and impose a sales and use tax for the purpose of financing development projects beneficial to the district. In calling an order for an election under the proposed statute, the applicable municipalities would be authorized to provide for the district boundaries to conform automatically to any changes in the boundaries of the portion of the municipality included in the district. The act would take effect immediately upon receiving a favorable vote by two-thirds of both houses; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2001. Of the applicable counties, only those under the 2 percent tax cap set forth in the Tax Code would be able to impose a sales and use tax. Three municipalities were contacted that fit the criteria. The City of Burleson estimated a one-half cent tax would yield a revenue gain of $1.4 million in fiscal year 2001. The revenue gain would increase by 5 percent each year through 2006. The City of Corpus Christi would only be able to implement a one-eighth of a cent tax increase, which would generate a revenue gain of $3.4 million, increasing by 2 percent each of the next five years. The City of Booker reported that their current tax revenue base is sufficient for their community needs and would not seek to implement a municipal development district or to raise taxes. Very few cities that would be meet the criteria of the bill are under the 2 percent tax cap. For the cities below the cap, the revenue gain would be significant. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JK, DB