LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
March 19, 2001
TO: Honorable Warren Chisum, Chair, House Committee on
Environmental Regulation
FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB724 by Turner, Sylvester (Relating to the transfer of
the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission's
powers and duties regarding water rates and services to
the Public Utility Commission of Texas.), As Introduced
**************************************************************************
* Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for *
* HB724, As Introduced: negative impact of $(437,265) through the *
* biennium ending August 31, 2003. *
**************************************************************************
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
****************************************************
* Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) *
* Impact to General Revenue Related *
* Funds *
* 2002 $(222,045) *
* 2003 (215,220) *
* 2004 (215,220) *
* 2005 (215,220) *
* 2006 (215,220) *
****************************************************
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal Probable Savings/(Cost) from Change in Number of State *
* Year General Revenue Fund Employees from FY 2001 *
* 0001 *
* 2002 $(222,045) 2.5 *
* 2003 (215,220) 2.5 *
* 2004 (215,220) 2.5 *
* 2005 (215,220) 2.5 *
* 2006 (215,220) 2.5 *
***************************************************************************
Technology Impact
Since the bill would transfer all Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission (TNRCC) property related to water rights and services to the
Public Utility Commission (PUC), it is anticipated that the PUC would not
experience any significant costs associated with the acquisition of
information technology resources. Any costs incurred in relocating and
installing computer-related equipment are expected to be absorbed using
PUC's existing resources.
It is estimated that there will be a one-time cost of $6,000 to the
Office of Public Utility Counsel (OPUC) for the purchase of computers
and software associated with an additional 2.5 FTEs.
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would transfer the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission's (TNRCC's) duties and responsibilities for the administration
of the state's water rates program to the Public Utility Commission on
September 1, 2001. The PUC would be authorized to collect regulatory
assessments from water utilities to cover costs related to water rates
administration.
The bill would transfer all funds, obligations contracts property,
records right, powers, duties, functions, programs, employees and
appropriations relating to water rights and services from TNRCC to the
PUC.
The bill would add the definition of water and sewer utilities to the
definition of a public utility, bringing water and sewer utilities under
the PUC's general administrative, regulatory and enforcement duties and
powers. This would give the Office of Public Utility Counsel (OPUC)
jurisdiction over water rates, as OPUC now has over rates for electric
and telecommunications utilities.
Methodology
Based on the level of resources TNRCC currently allocates to its water
rights program for personnel and administration, it is estimated that
$1,394,483 in appropriations out of the Water Resource Management Account
No. 158, as well as 25 FTEs, would be transferred from the TNRCC to the
PUC beginning in fiscal year 2002 and continuing in future years.
Since the OPUC currently has no staff with expertise in water rates
issues, it is estimated that 2.5 new FTEs would be required to represent
consumers on issues relating to water rights. It also is estimated that
the OPUC would need to hire various expert witnesses for litigation.
The bill does not provide for cost recovery by the OPUC. TNRCC's current
expenditures on water rates in the Public Interest Counsel Division is
reported by the TNRCC to be insignificant. Therefore, new costs to the
OPUC, $222,045 in 2002 and $215,220 in future years, would require
general revenue.
Upon passage of the bill, the TNRCC's annual interagency contract with
the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) would likely be
reduced and the PUC's interagency contract with SOAH would be increased
by the same amount, reflecting the shift of water rights cases from the
TNRCC to the PUC.
This estimate assumes that the TNRCC would retain approximately $1.3
million per year in appropriations from fee revenues not related to
water rates in the Water Resource Management Account No. 158.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 307 Secretary
of State, 360 State Office of Administrative
Hearings, 473 Public Utility Commission of Texas,
582 Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission, 475 Office of Public Utility Counsel
LBB Staff: JK, CL, TL