LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session March 15, 2001 TO: Honorable Jim Solis, Chair, House Committee on Economic Development FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB762 by Coleman (Relating to requiring certain employers who contract with or receive financial assistance from the state or a state agency to pay its employees a living wage; providing a penalty.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * HB762, As Introduced: negative impact of $(170,819,436) through * * the biennium ending August 31, 2003. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2002 $(83,326,554) * * 2003 (87,492,882) * * 2004 (91,867,526) * * 2005 (96,460,902) * * 2006 (101,283,948) * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: ************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Probable Probable * * Year Savings/(Cost) from Savings/(Cost) from Savings/(Cost) from * * General Revenue Fund Federal Funds - Other Funds * * (includes all Federal 0997 * * GR-related funds) 0555 * * 0001 * * 2002 $(83,326,554) $(40,753,292) $(15,917,725) * * 2003 (87,492,882) (42,790,957) (16,713,611) * * 2004 (91,867,526) (44,930,505) (17,549,292) * * 2005 (96,460,902) (47,177,031) (18,426,756) * * 2006 (101,283,948) (49,535,882) (19,348,093) * ************************************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill would amend Title 2 of the Labor Code by adding Chapter 65, requiring an employer that contracts with or receives a loan, grant, tax abatement, or other subsidy from the state or a state agency and a subcontractor on a service contract to pay employees who work in a "market area" a living wage. A "market area" is an area designated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban development in which the employer's office is located at which an employee works or is based. The living wage for the market area would be based on the fair market rent for the market area. The bill would take effect September 1, 2001. Methodology The fiscal impact is estimated to be $170.8 million of General Revenue and General Revenue-Dedicated Funds, $83.5 million of Federal Funds, and $32.6 million of Other Funds in the 2002-03 biennium. The estimate is based on fiscal year 2000 contracts with all state agencies, totaling $8.4 billion. For these contracts it was assumed that one-third of the cost of the contracts were labor costs and that one-third of the employees earning wages under these contracts were not being paid a living wage as defined in the bill. For fiscal year 2002, it was estimated there would be a 10 percent increase in wages for the portion of the employees not earning a living wage. From fiscal year 2003 forward, it is estimated that there would be a 5 percent increase in the living wage as fair market rents would increase. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: 302 Office of the Attorney General, 320 Texas Workforce Commission, 601 Texas Department of Transportation LBB Staff: JK, JO, RT, HL