LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                            February 12, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable Rene Oliveira, Chair, House Committee on Ways &
               Means
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  HB1025  by Isett (Relating to an exemption from the sales
               and use tax for certain assessments and fees related to
               telecommunications services.), As Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  HB1025, As Introduced:  negative impact of $(158,077,000) through     *
*  the biennium ending August 31, 2003.                                  *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2002                        $(73,569,000)  *
          *       2003                         (84,508,000)  *
          *       2004                         (75,555,000)  *
          *       2005                         (71,844,000)  *
          *       2006                         (73,658,000)  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal      Probable        Probable        Probable        Probable     *
* Year       Revenue         Revenue         Revenue         Revenue      *
*         Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  Gain/(Loss) to  *
*        General Revenue Telecommunicat-      Cities         Transit      *
*              Fund            ions                        Authorities    *
*              0001       Infrastructure                                  *
*                              Fund                                       *
*                              0345                                       *
*  2002     $(73,569,000)   $(12,028,000)   $(10,868,000)    $(2,656,000) *
*  2003      (84,508,000)    (13,673,000)    (13,733,000)     (3,356,000) *
*  2004      (75,555,000)               0    (12,278,000)     (3,000,000) *
*  2005      (71,844,000)               0    (11,675,000)     (2,853,000) *
*  2006      (73,658,000)               0    (11,970,000)     (2,925,000) *
***************************************************************************
  
         *****************************************************
         * Fiscal Year     Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) to    *
         *                          Counties/SPDs             *
         *      2002                               $(400,000) *
         *      2003                                (505,000) *
         *      2004                                (452,000) *
         *      2005                                (430,000) *
         *      2006                                (441,000) *
         *****************************************************
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would amend Section 151.007 of the Tax Code to exempt from the
limited sales and use tax certain telecommunications assessments and fees
that are passed through to purchasers.  The bill would exclude from the
sales price of telecommunications services the following assessments and
fees:  (1) the utility gross receipts assessment imposed under Subchapter
A, Chapter 16, Utilities Code, (2) the state universal service fund
assessment imposed under Subchapter B, Chapter 56, Utilities Code, (3)
the federal universal service fund charge,  (4) the Telecommunications
Infrastructure Fund (TIF) assessment imposed under Subchapter C, Chapter
57, Utilities Code, and (5) municipal franchise fees or right-of-way fees
authorized under Chapter 283, Local Government Code.

The bill would take effect on September 1, 2001.
  
  
Methodology
  
Telecommunications services are taxable by the state and units of local
government under Chapter 151 and Chapters 321 through 323 of the Tax
Code.  Telecommunications services taxed under Chapter 151 of Tax Code
also are subject to the TIF assessment under Section 57.043 of the
Utilities Code.

Under current law, the Public Utility assessment, state and federal
universal service charges, the TIF assessment, and municipal franchise
fees are included in the sales price of telecommunications services and
are subject to state and local sales tax.  These assessments and fees are
an expense to the company and are presumably recovered from purchasers
either through separate line-item charges on bills or through inclusion
in the price of the service.

The bill would negatively affect state and local sales tax collections
and TIF assessment revenues by excluding these assessments and fees from
the taxable sales price of telecommunications services.  The total amount
of fees and assessments that would be excluded was determined using
Comptroller tax files and data provided by the Public Utility Commission
and the Federal Communications Commission.  Assuming an implementation
date of September 1, 2001, the estimated losses were extrapolated through
fiscal 2006. The fiscal impacts on units of local government were
estimated proportionally.

A revenue loss to Fund 0345 in the 2002-03 biennium would occur because
the TIF assessment base also would be reduced if the Public Utility
assessment, state and federal universal service charges, and municipal
franchise fees were excluded from the sales price of telecommunications
services.  After 2003, the loss to Fund 0345 would drop to zero because
the TIF assessment is expected to end sometime in 2004.  The assessment
rate would be adjusted that year to generate the amount of revenue
necessary to reach the statutory cap of $1.5 billion.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
Local units of government would have a corresponding fiscal impact from
sales tax revenues, as indicated in the table above.
  
  
Source Agencies:   304   Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:         JK, SD, SM