LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session February 19, 2001 TO: Honorable Elliott Naishtat, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB1213 by Maxey (Relating to creation and implementation by the Health and Human Services Commission of family-based alternatives to the institutionalization of children.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * HB1213, As Introduced: negative impact of $(25,252,507) through * * the biennium ending August 31, 2003. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Net Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2002 $(5,828,917) * * 2003 (19,423,590) * * 2004 (27,063,184) * * 2005 (34,053,099) * * 2006 (34,852,427) * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: *********************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Probable Probable Probable Change in * * Year Savings/ Savings/ Savings/ Savings/ Number of * * (Cost) from (Cost) from (Cost) from (Cost) from State * * General General Federal Federal Employees * * Revenue Revenue Funds - Funds - from FY 2001 * * Fund Fund Federal Federal * * 0001 0001 0555 0555 * * 2002 $143,197 $216,594 13.5 * * $(5,972,114) $(4,241,011) * * 2003 574,514 864,649 27.0 * * (19,998,104) (15,392,306) * * 2004 861,987 1,296,758 27.0 * * (27,925,171) (22,379,518) * * 2005 1,149,316 1,729,011 27.0 * * (35,202,415) (29,368,511) * * 2006 1,200,077 1,805,375 27.0 * * (36,052,504) (30,417,338) * *********************************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill would require the Health and Human Services Commission to contract with community organizations for the development and implementation of a system under which a child may receive necessary services in a family-based alternative instead of an institution. Among other responsibilities, the commission would be required to: (1) begin implementation of the system in areas of the state with high numbers of children who reside in institutions, (2) ensure that waiver services are available immediately to each eligible child and (3) ensure that definitions applicable to waiver services are modified as necessary to permit family-based service delivery. The commission would also be required to report to the legislature on implementation of the system not later than January 1 of each year. Methodology General Assumptions 1. Savings shown in the table above result from no longer making a nursing facility payment for children moving to family-based community services. 2. Costs shown in the table above reflect increased costs for waiver services, foster care payments and development of the system. Increased costs are assumed for the Home and Community-based Services (HCS) waiver at the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation and for the Community Living and Support Services (CLASS) and Medically Dependent Children's Program (MDCP) waivers at the Department of Human Services. Additional caseworkers (13 in the first year and 25 in each subsequent year) and related operating costs are also provided due to the increase in waiver clients. 3. First year administrative costs are reduced by fifty percent to allow for rulemaking and other start-up demands. Other Assumptions 1. It is assumed that there are 1,253 children in institutions. Of this number, 302 are in state schools, 240 are in nursing facilities and the remainder are in private Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFs-MR). 2. It is assumed that the system would be implemented first in an area with 300 children in institutions. An additional 300 children would be served each year thereafter until 2006 when all children currently in institutions will be served. 3. It is assumed that the children provided waiver services each year would be equally distributed between the HCS, CLASS and MDCP waiver programs. 4. It is assumed that the state would not make payments for these children to nursing facilities, state schools and ICF-MR facilities once the child is placed in a community setting. It is assumed that there would be no savings to the state from freeing up a state school or ICF-MR bed because another client would enter the system and require services. 5. It is assumed that the Health and Human Services Commission would contract to develop the system. The approximate amount of the contract would be $1.3 million in 2002, $2.7 million in 2003, $3.1 million in 2004, $2.8 million in 2005 and $2.5 million in 2006. Additional amounts would be needed at the commission for administrative costs related to the contract, including two new full-time equivalent positions (FTEs). 6. It is assumed that 90 percent of the children residing in nursing facilities would require residential placement at a rate equivalent to the current Department of Protective and Regulatory Services' Level of Care 6 at a cost of $200.98 per day. Ten percent of the children would return to their families of origin and not require a residential payment. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: 340 Texas Department on Aging, 324 Texas Department of Human Services, 655 TX Dept. of Mental Health & Mental Retardation, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 530 Department of Protective and Regulatory Services LBB Staff: JK, HD, NM, KF