LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                              April 8, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable Steven Wolens, Chair, House Committee on State
               Affairs
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  HB1622  by Isett (Relating to the creation of a statewide
               contract management policy.), As Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  HB1622, As Introduced:  positive impact of $19,670,000 through the    *
*  biennium ending August 31, 2003.                                      *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Net Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2002                                   $0  *
          *       2003                           19,670,000  *
          *       2004                           19,670,000  *
          *       2005                           19,670,000  *
          *       2006                           19,670,000  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal      Probable        Probable        Probable        Probable     *
* Year    Savings/(Cost)  Savings/(Cost)  Savings/(Cost)  Savings/(Cost)  *
*          from General      from All      from Federal  from Other Funds *
*          Revenue Fund  General Revenue Funds - Federal                  *
*              0001         Dedicated          0555                       *
*                            Accounts                                     *
*  2002                $0              $0              $0              $0 *
*  2003        19,670,000       2,240,000       9,870,000       3,220,000 *
*  2004        19,670,000       2,240,000       9,870,000       3,220,000 *
*  2005        19,670,000       2,240,000       9,870,000       3,220,000 *
*  2006        19,670,000       2,240,000       9,870,000       3,220,000 *
***************************************************************************
  
Technology Impact
  
None.
  
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
This bill would require the Attorney General, the General Services
Commission, and the State Auditor to develop a contract management guide
for use by state agencies, and they would have to develop and implement
a statewide contract management curriculum for contract managers.  This
bill would take effect September 1, 2001 and the training for contract
managers would take effect September 1, 2002.
  
  
Methodology
  
According to the Comptroller of Public Account's e-Texas report, the
State of Texas contracts for $14 billion worth of goods and services
annually. Assuming that it takes 12 months to implement the statewide
contract management policy and training contract managers would not take
effect until September 1, 2002, fiscal year 2003 would be the earliest
savings could be generated.  Also assuming that contract managers would
save 0.25 percent on Texas contracts due to improved contract management
skills, this would equate to savings of $35 million annually.  These
saving would be across every state agency and could potentially impact
every fund.  For the purpose of this estimate, it is assumed that each
fund would have the same percentage of the savings as it is a percentage
of the 2000-01 biennial budget.

According to the Office of the Attorney General, General Services
Commission, and the State Auditor's Office, the agencies have estimated
there would be cost for the administration of the training program,
which includes developing the contract management guide, teaching the
classes, and monitoring training attendance.  However, these costs could
be absorbed within each of agency's existing resources.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
  
  
Source Agencies:   308   State Auditor's Office, 116   Sunset Advisory
                   Commission, 304   Comptroller of Public Accounts, 303
                   General Services Commission, 301   Office of the
                   Governor, 302   Office of the Attorney General
LBB Staff:         JK, RB, GS