LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                               May 26, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable Bill Ratliff, Lieutenant Governor
               Honorable James E. "Pete" Laney, Speaker of the House
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  HB1784  by Cook (Relating to the ratification, creation,
               administration, powers, duties, operation, and financing
               of groundwater conservation districts in and coordinated
               management of groundwater resources for the central
               Carrizo-Wilcox area.), Conference Committee Report
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  HB1784, Conference Committee Report:  positive impact of $0           *
*  through the biennium ending August 31, 2003.                          *
*                                                                        *
*  No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.        *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Net Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2002                                   $0  *
          *       2003                                    0  *
          *       2004                                    0  *
          *       2005                                    0  *
          *       2006                                    0  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
**************************************************************************
*Fiscal    Probable Revenue     Probable Revenue     Probable Revenue    *
* Year      Gain/(Loss) to      Gain/(Loss) from     Gain/(Loss) from    *
*          Brazos ValleyGCD   Post-Oak Savannah GCD Mid-East Texas GCD   *
*  2002               $514,372           $1,982,096             $385,094 *
*  2003                529,803            1,982,096              385,094 *
*  2004                545,697            1,982,096              385,094 *
*  2005                562,068            1,982,096              385,094 *
*  2006                578,930            1,982,096              385,094 *
**************************************************************************
  
Technology Impact
  
None.
  
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would ratify the creation of the Brazos Valley Groundwater
Conservation District in Robertson and Brazos counties and would create
the Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District in Milam and
Burleson counties and the Mid-East Texas Groundwater Conservation
District in Leon, Madison, and Freestone counties. Additionally, if those
three districts were to vote unanimously to do so and to be members, the
Central Carrizo-Wilcox Coordinating Council would be created to provide
regional management of groundwater while preserving local control and
through which the groundwater conservation district in that area could
coordinate their activities.

Current law regarding groundwater conservation districts allows districts
to issue bonds and to have taxing authority.  The districts that would
be created by this bill do not have taxing authority and would instead
receive funding from permit and other fees, bonds issued, revenues from
the ownership or operation of the district's works, improvements, and
facilities, and from the sale, transportation, and distribution of
water. 

The bill would require a confirmation election in each of the following
counties: Robertson, Brazos, Milam, Burleson, Leon, Madison and
Freestone. Each district would be dissolved on August 31, 2003 unless
voters confirmed the creation before that date. Provisions of the bill
would prevail over related provisions of any Senate Bill 2 from the
Regular 77th Legislative Session that may be adopted and signed into
law. The bill would take effect September 1, 2001.
  
  
Methodology
  
The table above presents the estimated new annual revenue for each
district. It does not include the cost to counties of holding the
confirmation election that would be required in each of the seven
counties affected by the bill.

The Brazos Valley Groundwater Conservation District's revenues would
increase because the bill would allow the district to increase its fees
by 3 percent each year. The Water Uses Section of the Texas Water
Development Board (TWDB) provided 1997 figures for reported groundwater
usage in each of the proposed districts.  The usage amounts were used to
estimate fees that each district could expect to generate according to
the provisions of this bill.  Statistics regarding groundwater
transported outside the district and the exemptions regarding water well
pumpage capacity for water use entities and rural domestic use were
unavailable.

Based on the reported ground water usage amounts that TWDB provided, and
assuming that districts would charge the maximum fees allowed in the
bill, the districts would have the following estimated revenues in their
first year of operation: Brazos Valley Groundwater Conservation District
would have $514,372, the Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation
District would have $2 million (including both Milam and Burleson
counties), and the Mid-East Texas Groundwater Conservation District would
have $385,094.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
Counties could incur a cost associated with a confirmation election, if a
separate election would be required. The cost to counties requiring a
separate election is estimated at $0.91 per voter, based on a recent
sample of county election costs. The cost to a county holding the
confirmation election in conjunction with a previously scheduled
election is not expected to be significant.
  
  
Source Agencies:   582   Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission,
                   580   Texas Water Development Board, 455   Railroad
                   Commission of Texas, 304   Comptroller of Public
                   Accounts
LBB Staff:         JK, CL, DB, TL