LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                              March 9, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable Dale B. Tillery, Chair, House Committee on
               Pensions & Investments
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  HB1853  by Maxey (Relating to coverage for certain
               dependent children under the Texas Employees Uniform
               Group Insurance Benefits Act.), As Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  HB1853, As Introduced:  negative impact of $(4,761,530) through       *
*  the biennium ending August 31, 2003.                                  *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Six-Year Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2001                           $(420,850)  *
          *       2002                          (2,037,860)  *
          *       2003                          (2,302,820)  *
          *       2004                          (2,602,190)  *
          *       2005                          (2,940,470)  *
          *       2006                          (3,322,730)  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Six-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal    Probable Savings/(Cost) from    Probable Savings/(Cost) from   *
* Year     Tobacco Settlement Receipts             Other Funds            *
*                      5040                            0997               *
*  2001                        $(420,850)                       $(73,400) *
*  2002                       (2,037,860)                       (331,740) *
*  2003                       (2,302,820)                       (374,880) *
*  2004                       (2,602,190)                       (423,610) *
*  2005                       (2,940,470)                       (478,680) *
*  2006                       (3,322,730)                       (540,910) *
***************************************************************************
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would increase the employer contributions to fund the cost of
basic coverage for children eligible to participate in the State Kids
Insurance Program (SKIP). Currently, the state pays for 80% of the cost
of dependent child coverage in the Uniform Group Insurance Program
administered by the Employees Retirement System (ERS).  The bill would
increase that contribution to 100%.  The bill would be effective
immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members
elected to each house or on September 1, 2001, if two-thirds votes are
not received.
  
  
Methodology
  
The current provisions of SKIP increased the state's dependent child
contribution from 50% of the cost to 80%.  The estimated cost of the
current 30% additional contribution for fiscal year 2001 is $3,145,500.
Increasing the state's contribution rate to 100% for the final three
months of the fiscal year, assuming passage by two-thirds of the
Legislature, would cost an additional $524,250.

Costs in subsequent years reflect contributions for the full 12 months,
and an assume a growth rate of 13% annually, based on ERS projections of
health care cost increases.  Currently 86% of SKIP expenditures are
funded with monies from the tobacco settlement, while the other 14%
comes from non-General Revenue-related funding sources.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
  
  
Source Agencies:   327   Employees Retirement System
LBB Staff:         JK, RB, SC