LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session April 17, 2001 TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB1884 by Thompson (Relating to filing fees for certain types of actions.), As Engrossed ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * HB1884, As Engrossed: positive impact of $0 through the biennium * * ending August 31, 2003. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2002 $0 * * 2003 0 * * 2004 0 * * 2005 0 * * 2006 0 * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: ***************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from * * Judicial Fund * * 0573 * * 2002 $3,873,900 * * 2003 3,873,900 * * 2004 3,873,900 * * 2005 3,873,900 * * 2006 3,873,900 * ***************************************************** Technology Impact There would be no technology impact as a result of the bill. Fiscal Analysis The bill would amend Section 51.701 of the Government Code to increase the additional court fee collected in district court from $40 to $50. Methodology In fiscal year 2000, district clerks reported there were 387,390 cases filed in their courts. Court fees collected in addition to filing fees are submitted to the state for deposit into the Judicial Fund to be used for court-related purposes for the support of the judiciary. Increasing the additional court fee from $40 to $50 would increase state revenue by $10 per case filed. Local Government Impact The bill would amend Section 51.317 of the Government Code, increasing filing fees to be collected by district clerks in civil cases. Currently, the filing fee is $45 and applies regardless of the number of plaintiffs to the suit. The bill would increase the fee based on the number of plaintiffs, with a fee of $55 for cases with ten or fewer plaintiffs and increasing up to a maximum of $170 for cases with 1,000 or more plaintiffs. Additionally, the provisions of the bill would increase the filing fee for a cross-action, counterclaim, intervention, contempt action, motion for new trial, or third-party petition to $45. Currently this fee is $15. The bill would also increase the filing fee from $8 to $12 for issuing a citation or other writ process including one copy. Based on a survey conducted by the Office of Court Administration covering civil cases filed in fiscal year 1999, it is estimated that over 99 percent of all civil cases filed in district court have less than 11 plaintiffs. Increasing the $45 filing fee to $55 would increase county revenues statewide by an estimated $3.9 million per year. It is estimated that a cross-action, counterclaim, intervention, contempt action, motion for new trial, or third party petition is filed in one out of every ten civil cases filed. Increasing the filing fee from $15 to $45 would increase county revenues statewide by approximately $1.6 million. It is estimated that 3 citations, writs, and/or copies are issued for every civil case filed. Increasing the filing fee from $8 to $12 would increase county revenues statewide by almost $4.6 million. Revenue gains to the counties, which would help offset expenses, would vary by county depending on the number of cases filed. Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration LBB Staff: JK, TB, DB