LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session March 7, 2001 TO: Honorable Patricia Gray, Chair, House Committee on Public Health FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB1927 by Geren (Relating to the installation of asbestos in public buildings; providing penalties.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * HB1927, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium * * ending August 31, 2003. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2002 $0 * * 2003 0 * * 2004 0 * * 2005 0 * * 2006 0 * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: ************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable (Cost) from Probable Revenue Change in Number of * * Year Asbestos Removal Gain from Asbestos State Employees from * * Licensure Account/ Removal Licensure FY 2001 * * GR-Dedicated Account/ * * 5017 GR-Dedicated * * 5017 * * 2002 $(202,244) $206,391 2.2 * * 2003 (231,964) 238,813 3.0 * * 2004 (231,964) 238,813 3.0 * * 2005 (231,964) 238,813 3.0 * * 2006 (231,964) 238,813 3.0 * ************************************************************************** Technology Impact Three personal computers and three printers, one for each additional FTE Fiscal Analysis The bill would prohibit the installation or reinstallation of building materials or replacement parts containing more than one percent asbestos in a public building. The bill would allow the Department of Health (TDH) to impose an administrative penalty on a contractor in violation of the provisions of the bill. The bill would allow the Office of the Attorney General to sue to collect the penalty. The effective date of the bill would be September 1, 2001, and would apply only to installation and reinstallation of asbestos on or after the effective date. Methodology According to TDH, Section 161.402 of the bill would increase the number of asbestos inspections the agency would conduct by 20%, based on local building permits. The current number of annual inspections is approximately 1,785. TDH estimates three FTEs would be needed to perform the additional inspections. It is assumed that an estimated 10% increase in the number of non-compliant items will be generated from the increase in inspections performed. TDH estimates that 5% (17) of these increased enforcement actions will be referred to the State Office of Administrative Hearings each year at an approximate cost of $3,000 per hearing, for a total dollar value of $51,000 a year. The year of implementation, FY 2002, TDH estimates only 12 actions will be referred at a cost of $36,000. Other expenses include travel (average of $25.20 per inspection), sample analysis (three samples per inspection x $20 per sample), and photo processing costs ($.50 x 6 photos per inspection). According to TDH, the bill does not authorize a fee to be charged. It is assumed TDH would assess fees sufficient to offset the costs associated with the bill under the agency's general authority. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: 302 Office of the Attorney General, 501 Texas Department of Health LBB Staff: JK, HD, KF, RM