LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                              March 13, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable David Swinford, Chair, House Committee on
               Agriculture & Livestock
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  HB2242  by Hardcastle (Relating to Attorney General
               providing services to conservation districts.), As
               Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  HB2242, As Introduced:  negative impact of $(731,100) through the     *
*  biennium ending August 31, 2003.                                      *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2002                           $(384,700)  *
          *       2003                            (346,400)  *
          *       2004                            (346,400)  *
          *       2005                            (346,400)  *
          *       2006                            (346,400)  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal    Probable Savings/(Cost) from     Change in Number of State     *
* Year         General Revenue Fund           Employees from FY 2001      *
*                      0001                                               *
*  2002                        $(384,700)                             6.0 *
*  2003                         (346,400)                             6.0 *
*  2004                         (346,400)                             6.0 *
*  2005                         (346,400)                             6.0 *
*  2006                         (346,400)                             6.0 *
***************************************************************************
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would provide that soil and water conservation districts may
call upon the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) to provide legal
services to the districts when the districts have exceeded 25 percent of
their financial resources to enforce flood easements held by the
districts.
  
  
Methodology
  
Based on information the OAG obtained from the Texas Soil and Water
Conservation Board, there are 750-1400 earthen dams in the state with
potential easement problems.  Based on the level of legal activity
regarding these dams reported by the Soil and Water Conservation Board,
the OAG estimates that they would need three additional attorneys, two
legal support staff, and one legal secretary to meet the projected
demand for legal services.  Additionally, there would be related costs
for equipment, operations, and contracted services of an engineer for
technical advice.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
Conservation districts would experience a savings on legal services in
direct proportion to expenditures by the Office of the Attorney General
for providing services to the districts.
  
  
Source Agencies:   302   Office of the Attorney General
LBB Staff:         JK, CL, DB, SC