LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session April 4, 2001 TO: Honorable Patricia Gray, Chair, House Committee on Public Health FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB2348 by Raymond (Relating to the Texas Diabetes Care Pilot Program.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * HB2348, As Introduced: negative impact of $(37,041,782) for an * * immediate effective date, and $(32,983,599) for a 90 day effective * * date, through the biennium ending August 31, 2003. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** All Funds, Six-Year Impact: *************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Probable Probable Change in * * Year Savings/(Cost) Savings/(Cost) Savings/(Cost) Number of State * * from General from GR Match from Federal Employees from * * Revenue Fund for Medicaid Funds - Federal FY 2000 * * 0001 0758 0555 * * 2001 $0 $0 $0 0.0 * * 2002 (7,646,175) (10,978,374) (12,992,514) 49.5 * * 2003 (10,398,560) (8,018,673) (10,725,615) 66.0 * * 2004 (10,606,640) (8,127,302) (10,885,672) 66.0 * * 2005 (10,818,800) (8,236,692) (11,050,237) 66.0 * * 2006 0 0 0 0.0 * *************************************************************************** The table above assumes an immediate effective date. A six-month start-up period is also assumed. All Funds, Five-Year Impact: The table below assumes a 90 day effective date. A six month start-up period is also assumed. *************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Probable Probable Change in * * Year Savings/(Cost) Savings/(Cost) Savings/(Cost) Number of State * * from General from GR Match from Federal Employees from * * Revenue Fund for Medicaid Funds - Federal FY 2001 * * 0001 0758 0555 * * 2002 $(5,097,450) $(9,468,916) $(10,811,676) 33.0 * * 2003 (10,398,560) (8,018,673) (10,725,615) 66.0 * * 2004 (10,606,640) (8,127,302) (10,885,672) 66.0 * * 2005 (10,818,800) (8,236,692) (11,050,729) 66.0 * * 2006 0 0 0 0.0 * *************************************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill would require the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) to develop a Texas Diabetes Care Pilot Program for Medicaid recipients in counties selected by the commission with a high incidence of and a high death rate from diabetes. The counties selected must include border counties. The bill would become effective immediately if it receives two-thirds vote in both chambers, otherwise on the ninety-first day after the last day of the Legislative session. The provisions of the bill would expire September 1, 2005. Methodology The Department of Health (TDH) assumed the pilot would be implemented in 43 border counties, including Bexar county, which was the site of a diabetes pilot program. The number of participants is estimated to be 29,985 for FY 2002, is expected to increase by 2% each year thereafter. The pilot program would provide additional services including case management, nutritional services, and diabetes education. It is assumed the case management services would cost $236.03 per year per client and nutritional services would cost $203 per year per client. Case management and nutritional services would be matched at the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage, which is assumed to be 60.20% in FY 2002, 60.08% in FY 2003, and 60.07% in subsequent years. Diabetes education is assumed to cost $340 per client per year, and is assumed to be 100 percent General Revenue. TDH estimated a need for an additional 66 Full-Time Equivalent positions per year, along with associated costs such as benefits, computers, and operating. In addition, it is assumed that outreach expenditures would be $300,000 per county in the first year and $100,000 per county afterwards. Staffing, related expenses, operating, and outreach costs are assumed to be eligible for administrative matching funds, which would be 50% federal. It is assumed a delay of six months would be necessary for start-up, rule making, and other implementation issues. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 501 Texas Department of Health LBB Staff: JK, HD, KF