LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session April 20, 2001 TO: Honorable Steven Wolens, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB2773 by Chavez (Relating to the Department of Information Resources' oversight of electronic projects.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * HB2773, As Introduced: negative impact of $(867,500) through the * * biennium ending August 31, 2003. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2002 $(437,500) * * 2003 (430,000) * * 2004 (180,000) * * 2005 (187,500) * * 2006 (180,000) * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: *************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Savings/(Cost) from Change in Number of State * * Year General Revenue Fund Employees from FY 2001 * * 0001 * * 2002 $(437,500) 3.0 * * 2003 (430,000) 3.0 * * 2004 (180,000) 3.0 * * 2005 (187,500) 3.0 * * 2006 (180,000) 3.0 * *************************************************************************** Technology Impact In FY 2002 there would be a cost of $ 7,500 for personal computers and in FY 2005 $7,500 would be needed for upgrades. Fiscal Analysis The bill would prevent a state agency from spending appropriated funds for an electronic government project if the Department of Information Resources (DIR) determines that the project fails to meet expectations. DIR will consult with the Legislative Budget Board and the budget division of the governor's office to establish criteria for determining if an electronic government project fails to meet expectations, and to develop procedures for negotiating with a state agency that is not allowed to spend appropriated funds for an electronic government project, for allowing a state agency to resume spending appropriated funds for a project, and recommending options for future spending of the appropriated funds. The bill would also require DIR to establish a quality assurance team to monitor projects over which the department has jurisdiction. The team would be required to monitor all projects to determine compliance with department standards. The bill would further allows DIR to create a program management office (PMO) to perform the duties outlined in this bill. Methodology According to DIR 3 FTEs would be needed to meet these requirements. The estimated costs for the three FTEs would be approximately $140,000 per year plus an additional $40,000 per year in benefits. According to DIR, the functions required in the legislation, including oversight and review of information resource (IR) projects, quality assurance of IR projects, and a project management office (PMO) to oversee the functions, are not currently performed by DIR. DIR estimates that approximately $250,000 in FY 2002 and FY 2003 would be needed for professional services to assist in start-up of the PMO. The services would be used to implement the following functions: * Development of project management standards to assist and guide agencies, * Establishment of a standardized reporting tool for agencies to report on their e-government projects and the status of the project, * Development of quality assurance measurement criteria for determination of project status. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: 313 Department of Information Resources, 301 Office of the Governor LBB Staff: JK, RB, SK