LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                              March 26, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable Senfronia Thompson, Chair, House Committee on
               Judicial Affairs
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  HB3168  by Thompson (Relating to the composition of
               judicial districts in this state.), As Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  HB3168, As Introduced:  positive impact of $33,814,484 through the    *
*  biennium ending August 31, 2003.                                      *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2003                          $33,814,484  *
          *       2004                           50,721,726  *
          *       2005                           50,721,726  *
          *       2006                           50,721,726  *
          *       2007                           50,721,726  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal    Probable Savings/(Cost) from     Change in Number of State     *
* Year         General Revenue Fund           Employees from FY 2002      *
*                      0001                                               *
*  2003                       $33,814,484                         (273.0) *
*  2004                        50,721,726                         (409.0) *
*  2005                        50,721,726                         (409.0) *
*  2006                        50,721,726                         (409.0) *
*  2007                        50,721,726                         (409.0) *
***************************************************************************
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would repeal Subchapters B through E of Chapter 24 of the
Government Code which would eliminate over 400 judicial districts in
Texas.  The bill would establish two judicial districts, District A-1 and
District A-2.  District A-1 would encompass 182 counties, and District
A-2 would encompass 72 counties.

The bill would take effect December 31, 2003.
  
  
Methodology
  
The estimate assumes that the elimination of the offices of 409 district
judges would result in an annual savings of $124,014 per judge in
salaries and benefits and would save the state over $50.7 million
annually.  However, any costs associated with the operation of the two
new judicial districts have not been considered in this estimate.

Additionally, the costs or savings related to the cessation of current
rates of prosecution and incarceration have not been considered in this
estimate.  Likewise, the costs or savings related to the cessation of
the current rates of adjudication of civil cases have not been
considered in this estimate.  Finally, the costs relating to the loss of
fees collections from district courts have not been considered in this
estimate.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
The elimination of 409 judicial districts would save counties over $91.5
million statewide.  This estimate assumes that local government expends
an average of $223,640 annually to run each district court.  Costs or
savings related to the cessation of adjudication of criminal and civil
cases have not been considered in this estimate.
  
  
Source Agencies:   304   Comptroller of Public Accounts, 212   Office of
                   Court Administration
LBB Staff:         JK, TB, JN