LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                               May 24, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable James E. "Pete" Laney, Speaker of the House,
               House of Representatives
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  HB3323  by Solomons (relating to the creation,
               organization, and powers of a coordinated county
               transportation authority; authorizing the imposition of
               a tax, the issuance of bonds and notes, and the exercise
               of the power of eminent domain.), As Passed 2nd House
  
**************************************************************************
*  No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.        *
**************************************************************************
  
Local Government Impact
  
The fiscal impact to units of local government would vary depending on
the size of the local body, the transportation services that would be
provided under the provisions of the bill, and current tax law. It is
assumed that larger counties, population 300,000 or more, will be more
likely to establish a regional transit authority (RTA) than counties with
smaller populations.  For the purposes of providing a cost estimate, the
Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) was contacted.
The Corpus Christi RTA services Nueces county, which has an estimated
population of 300,000, reported providing bus and paratransit services
and operating on approximately $23 million each year.  It is assumed that
RTAs providing like services in other counties may realize similar
operating costs in addition to initial start up costs.  It is also
assumed that counties, and municipalities within those counties,
establishing and maintaining an RTA would utilize taxation, fees, and
bond initiatives to fund transportation services and that generated
revenue would cover the cost of operation.  The bill allows for the
formation of an executive committee to determine the minimum uniform rate
for taxation.

The bill would also allow a municipality, after holding an election, to
establish a tax rate that is higher than the minimum uniform rate
established by the executive committee if the established authority will
provide the municipality with a higher level of service.
  
  
Source Agencies:   
LBB Staff:         JK, RB, RT, MW, DW