LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session April 11, 2001 TO: Honorable Kim Brimer, Chair, House Committee on Business & Industry FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB3342 by Moreno, Joe E. (Relating to the rights of temporary employees.), As Introduced ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * HB3342, As Introduced: positive impact of $85,950,000 through the * * biennium ending August 31, 2003. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2002 $35,550,000 * * 2003 50,400,000 * * 2004 53,800,000 * * 2005 57,400,000 * * 2006 61,800,000 * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: *************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Probable Probable Probable * * Year Revenue Revenue Savings/(Cost) Revenue * * Gain/(Loss) Gain/(Loss) from Gain/(Loss) to * * from General from Unemployment Cities * * Revenue Fund Unemployment Compensation * * 0001 Compensation Benefit Account * * Clearance 0937 * * Account * * 0936 * * 2002 $35,550,000 $2,779,293,627 $6,419,000 * * $(2,779,293,627) * * 2003 50,400,000 2,779,293,627 (2,779,293,627) 9,100,000 * * 2004 53,800,000 2,779,293,627 (2,779,293,627) 9,714,000 * * 2005 57,400,000 2,779,293,627 (2,779,293,627) 10,364,000 * * 2006 61,800,000 2,779,293,627 (2,779,293,627) 11,158,000 * *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** *Fiscal Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) to Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) to * * Year Transit Authorities Counties/SPDs * * 2002 $447,000 $10,000 * * 2003 634,000 14,000 * * 2004 677,000 14,000 * * 2005 722,000 15,000 * * 2006 777,000 17,000 * *************************************************************************** Fiscal Analysis The bill would add Chapter 94 to Title 2 of the Labor Code. It would entitle temporary employees who use a temporary employment service to equal compensation and employee benefits as other employees at the client company who perform equivalent work, and it defines prohibited charges and deductions from compensation. The bill would require temporary employment services to provide notices and disclosure about all employment openings it has available, to provide workers' compensation insurance for each temporary employee, and to follow other requirements stipulated in the bill, including forbidding temporary employment services from sending workers to a site where a labor dispute is in progress. Gross receipts of temporary employment services would be subject to state and local sales taxes under the bill. There would also be a disqualification to unemployment benefits of temporary workers' claims allowed under the bill. The Attorney General, district attorneys, and city attorneys would be provided with the authority to prosecute violations under the bill. Although the bill does not state an effective date, it is assumed, for the purposes of this fiscal note, that the bill would take effect on September 1, 2001. Methodology The Texas Workforce Commission estimates the fiscal impact of the bill would be about $2.8 billion to the Unemployment Compensation Benefit Account 0937 in each year of the 2002-03 biennium due to Texas becoming ineligible for the deferred tax credit under the FUTA. The deferred tax credit is equivalent to 5.4 percent of the first $7,000 of wage compensation paid to covered workers in the state. To make up for the loss of this credit, contributory employers (those who make contributions for covered employees to the Unemployment Compensation Clearance Account annually) would have to pay an additional $378 per covered worker to the Unemployment Compensation Clearance Account 0936 in each year of the 2002-03 biennium. In calendar year 1999, there were 7,352,627 covered workers in Texas. The $85,950,000 gain to the General Revenue Fund from the additional sales tax revenue in the 2002-03 biennium is based on the estimates in the Comptroller's Tax Exemption and Tax Incidence report in January 2001. The tax revenue estimates were adjusted for pre-existing contracts and adjusted for an effective date of September 1, 2001, and extrapolated through fiscal 2006. The fiscal impacts on units of local government were estimated proportionally. The benefits disqualification would make the Texas unemployment compensation system out of conformance with the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA), resulting in a loss of the deferred tax credit. The loss of this tax credit would effectively increase the unemployment insurance taxes that employers pay to the Unemployment Compensation Fund. Local Government Impact Local units of government would have a corresponding fiscal impact from sales tax revenues, as indicated in the table above. Source Agencies: 320 Texas Workforce Commission LBB Staff: JK, JO, RT, HL, SM