LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                                May 7, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable Clyde Alexander, Chair, House Committee on
               Transportation
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  SB4  by Shapiro (Relating to the administration and use
               of the Texas Mobility Fund and the issuance of
               obligations for financing the construction,
               reconstruction, acquisition, and expansion of state
               highways and other mobility projects.), Committee Report
               2nd House, Substituted
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  SB4, Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted:  negative impact of     *
*  $(160,442,701) through the biennium ending August 31, 2003.           *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2002                        $(26,646,736)  *
          *       2003                        (133,795,965)  *
          *       2004                        (131,423,563)  *
          *       2005                        (129,051,161)  *
          *       2006                        (126,678,759)  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal      Probable        Probable        Probable        Probable     *
* Year       Revenue         Revenue      Savings/(Cost)  Savings/(Cost)  *
*          Gain/(Loss)     Gain/(Loss)    from New Texas   from General   *
*         from New Texas  from New Texas  Mobility Fund    Revenue Fund   *
*        Mobility Fund - Mobility Fund -                       0001       *
*         Bond Proceeds  Debt Svc Reserve                                 *
*  2002    $1,353,279,280    $132,609,764  $(270,655,856)   $(26,646,736) *
*  2003                 0               0   (270,655,856)   (133,795,965) *
*  2004                 0               0   (270,655,856)   (131,423,563) *
*  2005                 0               0   (270,655,856)   (129,051,161) *
*  2006                 0               0   (270,655,856)   (126,678,759) *
***************************************************************************
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would amend the Transportation Code to authorize the Texas
Transportation Commission (TTC) to issue and enter into credit agreements
related to obligations in the name and on behalf of the state for
financing the construction, reconstruction, acquisition, and expansion of
state highways and other mobility projects through the Texas Department
of Transportation (TxDOT) and the Texas Mobility Fund.  The bill would
pledge the full faith and credit of the state to the payment of
obligations and credit agreements in the event that revenue and money for
and on deposit in the fund would be insufficient to cover debt
obligations.  The bill would establish authorizations, requirements, and
limitations for issuing and aggregating obligations, investing, using,
and administering the fund.  The bill would not dedicate a specific
amount to the Texas Mobility Fund, but would require that revenue
dedicated or appropriated pursuant to the requirements of the Texas
Constitution would be deposited to the fund.  The bill would also require
the Comptroller to hold and certify amounts within the fund.  The bill
would require that income received from the investment of money in the
fund be deposited in the fund subject to any requirements imposed by
proceedings authorizing obligations to protect the tax-exempt status of
interest payable on the obligations under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986.

Contingent upon the enactment of SB 342, the bill would take effect on
the date on which the constitutional amendment, SJR 16, proposed by the
77th Legislature, Regular Session, creating the Texas Mobility Fund and
authorizing the issuance of obligations for financing the construction
and acquisition of extensions, improvements, and expansions of the
state's highways, roads, and other mobility projects would take effect.
If that amendment does not receive approval by the voters, or if SB 342
is not enacted, the bill would have no effect.
  
  
Methodology
  
It is assumed that an annual transfer would be made from the General
Revenue Fund to the Texas Mobility Fund for the purposes of making
required debt payments for the bonds.  It is assumed bonds totaling $1.49
billion would be issued for 20 years at an interest rate of 4.6 percent
with semi-annual payments.  Other assumptions include fees of $700,000
for the cost of issuance, underwriting fees of $5 per $1,000 of bonds, a
debt service reserve, and that interest earnings during construction
would be used towards the project cost base on an 83 month draw.  It is
estimated that TxDOT would issue bonds in February 2002, and that the
debt service required for the bonds would cost $26.6 million in general
revenue in fiscal year 2002 with the cost increasing to $133.7 million in
fiscal year 2003 and $131.4 million in fiscal year 2004.  It is
estimated that annual debt service costs would decrease by approximately
$2.4 million in each subsequent year for the remaining life of the bonds.

It is assumed that the issuance of these obligations would impact the
constitutional debt limit under Article III, Section 49-j of the Texas
Constitution.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
  
  
Source Agencies:   601   Texas Department of Transportation, 304
                   Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:         JK, JO, RT, MW