LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
April 11, 2001
TO: Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on
State Affairs
FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB221 by Staples (Relating to government purchasing
using the reverse auction procedure.), Committee Report
1st House, Substituted
**************************************************************************
* Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for *
* SB221, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: positive impact *
* of $6,800,000 through the biennium ending August 31, 2003. *
* *
* The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal *
* basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of *
* the bill. *
**************************************************************************
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
****************************************************
* Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) *
* Impact to General Revenue Related *
* Funds *
* 2002 $3,400,000 *
* 2003 3,400,000 *
* 2004 3,400,000 *
* 2005 3,400,000 *
* 2006 3,400,000 *
****************************************************
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
*****************************************************
* Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) from *
* General Revenue Fund *
* 0001 *
* 2002 $3,400,000 *
* 2003 3,400,000 *
* 2004 3,400,000 *
* 2005 3,400,000 *
* 2006 3,400,000 *
*****************************************************
Technology Impact
None.
Fiscal Analysis
This bill would amend the Government Code to authorize the General
Services Commission to use a reverse auction procedure to procure goods
and services for the state.
Methodology
In the e-Texas report, the Comptroller of Public Accounts estimates
potential savings generated by reverse auctions at anywhere from 2
percent to 10 percent. In fiscal year 1999 approximately $70 million
was expended on such items as fuel, office furniture, paper, reflective
sheeting, salt, and tires and tubes. Using a midpoint of 6 percent as
potential savings, less vendor payment of 20 percent, it is estimated
that approximately $3.4 million could be saved using reverse auctions.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is
anticipated.
Source Agencies: 303 General Services Commission, 304 Comptroller
of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: JK, RB, GS, DW