LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session April 11, 2001 TO: Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: SB221 by Staples (Relating to government purchasing using the reverse auction procedure.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted ************************************************************************** * Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for * * SB221, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: positive impact * * of $6,800,000 through the biennium ending August 31, 2003. * * * * The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal * * basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of * * the bill. * ************************************************************************** General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: **************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) * * Impact to General Revenue Related * * Funds * * 2002 $3,400,000 * * 2003 3,400,000 * * 2004 3,400,000 * * 2005 3,400,000 * * 2006 3,400,000 * **************************************************** All Funds, Five-Year Impact: ***************************************************** * Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) from * * General Revenue Fund * * 0001 * * 2002 $3,400,000 * * 2003 3,400,000 * * 2004 3,400,000 * * 2005 3,400,000 * * 2006 3,400,000 * ***************************************************** Technology Impact None. Fiscal Analysis This bill would amend the Government Code to authorize the General Services Commission to use a reverse auction procedure to procure goods and services for the state. Methodology In the e-Texas report, the Comptroller of Public Accounts estimates potential savings generated by reverse auctions at anywhere from 2 percent to 10 percent. In fiscal year 1999 approximately $70 million was expended on such items as fuel, office furniture, paper, reflective sheeting, salt, and tires and tubes. Using a midpoint of 6 percent as potential savings, less vendor payment of 20 percent, it is estimated that approximately $3.4 million could be saved using reverse auctions. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: 303 General Services Commission, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JK, RB, GS, DW