LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
February 16, 2001
TO: Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on
State Affairs
FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB463 by Shapleigh (Relating to the authority of a
county to borrow from the state infrastructure bank.), As
Introduced
**************************************************************************
* No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. *
**************************************************************************
The bill would amend Chapter 222 of the Transportation Code to allow a
county to borrow directly from the State Infrastructure Bank for road
and bridge construction projects. The bank would be repaid from the
proceeds of ad valorem taxes imposed for that purpose. The bill would
take effect immediately if it received the requisite of two-thirds
majority votes of each house of the Legislature. Otherwise, it would
take effect September 1, 2001.
Local Government Impact
Local public entities spend time implementing the tax note approach and
incur costs for bond counsel and financial advisors that would not be
otherwise required. According to the Texas Bond Review Board, issuance
costs primarily consist of underwriters fees, bond counsel fees,
financial advisor fees, rating agency fees, and printing costs. These
costs average $3.21 per $1,000 issued in 2000. Generally, the larger the
bond issue, the greater the issuance costs.
Local government entities that choose to utilize the State Infrastructure
Bank because of direct borrowing would incur a cost savings from reduced
issuance costs. The amount of savings would vary based on the amount of
each loan and the number of projects for which money is borrowed.
Source Agencies: 601 Texas Department of Transportation, 304
Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: JK, RB, MW, DB