LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session May 1, 2001 TO: Honorable Gary Walker, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management FROM: John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: SB517 by Lucio (Relating to authorizing certain counties to regulate land development; providing a penalty.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted ************************************************************************** * No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. * ************************************************************************** Local Government Impact The bill would grant regulatory authority to a county located within 50 miles of an international border for residential land development in the unincorporated areas of the county. If the county adopts a residential building code, it must be the International Residential Code as it existed on May 1, 2001 and the code must apply to all construction, alteration, remodeling, enlargement, and repair of residential structures in the unincorporated area of the county. The county would be allowed to charge a reasonable fee for issuing building permits and all fees collected from building permits could be used only for the purpose of administering the building permit program. Under the provisions of the bill, if the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs classifies a household as a low-income household, a penalty may not be assessed against the owner-occupant of the residential dwelling for a building standards or building code violation relating to the dwelling unless the county makes available to the owner-occupant housing rehabilitation assistance in an amount sufficient to cure the violation. The assistance would be required to be in the form of a grant or loan with payment terms that would not cause the housing expenses of the owner-occupant to exceed 30 percent of their net income. Two of the counties that would be affected by the provisions of the bill were contacted. The Webb County Treasurer indicated the fees would cover costs for the building permit program and since any loans made by the county would have to be repaid, they anticipated little or no fiscal impact. The Val Verde County Auditor anticipates their county would likely add a full-time building inspector and a secretary to that position to implement the provisions of the bill; the language of the bill specifies the qualifications of the inspector, but does not indicate the inspector must be an employee of the county. It is assumed a county could also contract for an inspector's services. No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JK, CL, DB