LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
                                Revision 1
  
                              April 3, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable J.E. "Buster" Brown, Chair, Senate Committee on
               Natural Resources
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  SB1339  by Ogden (Relating to requiring owners or
               operators of poultry operations to implement and maintain
               certified water quality management plans.), As
               Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  SB1339, As Introduced:  negative impact of $(325,000) through the     *
*  biennium ending August 31, 2003.                                      *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Net Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2002                           $(162,500)  *
          *       2003                            (162,500)  *
          *       2004                            (162,500)  *
          *       2005                            (162,500)  *
          *       2006                            (162,500)  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal    Probable Savings/(Cost) from     Change in Number of State     *
* Year         General Revenue Fund           Employees from FY 2001      *
*                      0001                                               *
*  2002                        $(162,500)                             3.0 *
*  2003                         (162,500)                             3.0 *
*  2004                         (162,500)                             3.0 *
*  2005                         (162,500)                             3.0 *
*  2006                         (162,500)                             3.0 *
***************************************************************************
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would require that all poultry facilities implement and maintain
a water quality management plan certified by the State Soil and Water
Conservation Board. Poultry facilities currently implement certified
plans on a voluntary basis.

The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) would enforce
the water quality plan requirement.
  
  
Methodology
  
The Soil and Water Conservation Board estimates that there are currently
745 poultry operations in the state without certified water quality
management plans. It is expected that all 745 operations would be
certified by the end of fiscal year 2003. It is estimated that an
additional 100 applications for new plans or plan amendments would be
required in fiscal years 2004 through 2006.

It is estimated that the Soil and Water Conservation Board would require
a total of three additional FTEs to implement the provisions of the bill
at a total cost of $162,500 per year. It is expected that one FTE would
be located at the agency's headquarters to process applications, data and
certifications. It is expected that the remaining two additional FTEs
would be located in regional offices, conducting oversight of plan
development and maintenance at the district level.

The bill is not expected to have a significant fiscal impact on TNRCC's
enforcement and compliance activities.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is
anticipated.
  
  
Source Agencies:   592   State Soil & Water Conservation Board, 582
                   Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
LBB Staff:         JK, CL, TL