LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                              April 6, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on
               State Affairs
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  SB1518  by Lucio (Relating to state purchasing using the
               reverse auction procedure.), As Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  SB1518, As Introduced:  positive impact of $6,800,000 through the     *
*  biennium ending August 31, 2003.                                      *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2002                           $3,400,000  *
          *       2003                            3,400,000  *
          *       2004                            3,400,000  *
          *       2005                            3,400,000  *
          *       2006                            3,400,000  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal    Probable Savings/(Cost) from    Probable Savings/(Cost) from   *
* Year         General Revenue Fund             State Highway Fund        *
*                      0001                            0006               *
*  2002                        $3,400,000                        $252,000 *
*  2003                         3,400,000                         504,000 *
*  2004                         3,400,000                         756,000 *
*  2005                         3,400,000                       1,008,000 *
*  2006                         3,400,000                       1,260,000 *
***************************************************************************
  
Technology Impact
  
None
  
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
This bill would amend the Government Code to authorize the General
Services Commission to use a reverse auction procedure to procure goods
and services for the state.

This bill would also specify which commodities purchased for, or by, the
Texas Department of Transportation would have to be purchased using
reverse auctions.  The bill would establish the percentage of those
commodities, ranging from 10 to 50 percent, that would be purchased
using reverse auctions in fiscal year 2002 through fiscal year 2006.
  
  
Methodology
  
In the e-Texas report, the Comptroller of Public Accounts estimates
potential savings generated by reverse auctions at anywhere from 2
percent to 10 percent.  In fiscal year 1999 approximately $70 million was
expended on such items as fuel, office furniture, paper, reflective
sheeting, salt, and tires and tubes.  Using a midpoint of 6 percent as
potential savings, less vendor payment of 20 percent, it is estimated
that approximately $3.4 million could be saved using reverse auctions.

Also, in the Comptroller's report, Paving the Way: A Performance Review
of the Texas Department of Transportation, the Comptroller's office
estimates reverse auctions could be expected to generate savings for
items such as cement, fuel, paint, furniture, and drainage materials.
Using the material categories and dollar purchases for fiscal 1999,
approximately $42 million, and subjecting 10 percent of these purchase
or about $4.2 million to reverse auctions in fiscal year 2002, and using
a midpoint of 6 percent as potential savings, it is estimated that
$252,000 could be saved.  Using reverse auctions to purchase 20 percent
of these commodities, or about $8.4 million, in fiscal year 2003, would
result in savings of about $504,000.  By 2006, when at least 50 percent
of these commodities, or about $21 million, would be purchased using
reverse auctions, the savings would be $1,260,000.
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is
anticipated.
  
  
Source Agencies:   303   General Services Commission, 304   Comptroller
                   of Public Accounts, 601   Texas Department of
                   Transportation
LBB Staff:         JK, RB, GS