LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                              Austin, Texas
                                     
                    FISCAL NOTE, 77th Regular Session
  
                              March 28, 2001
  
  
          TO:  Honorable Mike Moncrief, Chair, Senate Committee on
               Health & Human Services
  
        FROM:  John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
  
       IN RE:  SB1592  by Moncrief (Relating to the imposition of a
               quality assurance fee on nursing institutions; providing
               an administrative penalty.), As Introduced
  
**************************************************************************
*  Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for    *
*  SB1592, As Introduced:  an impact of $0 through the biennium          *
*  ending August 31, 2003.                                               *
*                                                                        *
*  The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal      *
*  basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of    *
*  the bill.                                                             *
**************************************************************************
  
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
          ****************************************************
          *  Fiscal Year  Probable Net Positive/(Negative)   *
          *               Impact to General Revenue Related  *
          *                             Funds                *
          *       2002                                   $0  *
          *       2003                                    0  *
          *       2004                                    0  *
          *       2005                                    0  *
          *       2006                                    0  *
          ****************************************************
  
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
  
***************************************************************************
*Fiscal      Probable        Probable        Probable        Probable     *
* Year       Revenue      Savings/(Cost)     Revenue      Savings/(Cost)  *
*          Gain/(Loss)     from General    Gain/(Loss)     from Federal   *
*          from General    Revenue Fund    from Federal  Funds - Federal  *
*          Revenue Fund        0001      Funds - Federal       0555       *
*              0001                            0555                       *
*  2002      $186,000,000  $(186,000,000)    $279,000,000  $(279,000,000) *
*  2003       202,740,000   (202,740,000)     304,110,000   (304,110,000) *
*  2004       204,246,600   (204,246,600)     306,369,900   (306,369,900) *
*  2005       204,382,194   (204,382,194)     306,573,291   (306,573,291) *
*  2006       204,394,397   (204,394,397)     306,591,596   (306,591,596) *
***************************************************************************
  
Fiscal Analysis
  
The bill would amend Chapter 242, Health and Safety Code, by adding
Subchapter Q, Quality Assurance Fee. The bill would require that each
institution, for which a license fee must be paid under Section 242.034,
be assessed a quality assurance fee. The Health and Human Services
Commission (HHSC) or the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) at the
direction of the Commission would collect the fee. The fee may be
appropriated only for the purposes of the paying the cost of
administering provisions of the bill and increasing rate of reimbursement
paid to institutions under the state Medicaid Program.

The Quality Assurance Fee would be assessed on each licensed institution
at a rate equal to six percent of the institution's gross receipts from
its operations in Texas. The fee would be payable monthly, in addition to
other fees imposed under Chapter 242 of the Health and Safety Code, and
would be an allowable cost for reimbursement under the state Medicaid
program.

If any portion of the chapter is held invalid by a final order of a court
that is not subject to appeal, or if the Health and Human Services
Commission determines that the imposition of the fee and the expenditure
as prescribed by the subchapter of amounts collected will not entitle
the state to receive additional federal funds under the Medicaid
program, the commission is required to stop collection of the quality
assurance fee and return any money collected, but not spent, under the
subchapter to the institutions that paid the fees in proportion to the
total amount paid by those institutions.
  
  
Methodology
  
The HHSC estimate stated either HHSC or DHS would collect and distribute
the fee and HHSC or DHS would likely have to add staff and associated
administrative support. The HHSC estimated administrative costs to be
$1.0 million annually with a one-time technology cost of $100,000 in FY
2002. The HHSC did not include an estimate of staff and administrative
support positions that would be needed pursuant to the bill.

The HHSC estimated General Revenues generated would be between $185.0
million in FY 2002 to $204.0 million in FY 2006. The HHSC assumed that
because provisions of the bill require the General Revenue funds
generated be used for rate reimbursements to nursing facilities, the
State would use the General Revenue funds to draw down additional
Medicaid funds. The Commission estimated these additional federal funds
to be between $279 to $307 million for FY 2002 through 2006,
respectively.  The Health and Human Services Commission assumes the
additional State and federal funds would be allocated to the facilities,
if appropriated, through a modeled rate during the first two years and
incorporated into the cost reports using the cost report methodology
subsequently. The Health and Human Services Commission assumes that,
under this scenario, there would be no compounding effect of increased
expenditures adopted through the cost report.

However, the HHSC stated in the estimate if the assumption regarding the
use of the increased fee revenues is not correct, these fees are to be
used only for rate increases for the current year and the previous years'
rate increases become part of the base appropriation for nursing
facilities, then there
**could be a very significant impact on the General Revenue Fund
beginning in the second year of this program (FY 2003).**
In other words, the amount of revenue gains become new General Revenue
costs in the second year of the program
  
  
Local Government Impact
  
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
  
  
Source Agencies:   324   Texas Department of Human Services, 529
                   Health and Human Services Commission, 304
                   Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:         JK, HD, ML