C.S.H.B. 47 78(1)    BILL ANALYSIS


C.S.H.B. 47
By: Nixon
Civil Practices
Committee Report (Substituted)



BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

Current law permits an asbestos claim to be placed in the civil court
system like any other civil claim.  A large number of asbestos claims
pending in the United States have been filed in Texas courts. 

C.S.H.B. 47 creates a new chapter in the Civil Practices and Remedies Code
for civil claims relating to asbestos or other mineral dust exposure.
This bill establishes mandatory guidelines and directs the Supreme Court
to adopt rules for the creation of an inactive docket for unimpaired
asbestos or other mineral dust claims.  The primary purpose of the
inactive docket is to conserve limited financial resources for the most
seriously ill claimants and preserve all exposure claims until such time
as the claimant becomes truly impaired.  If litigation continues on the
current path unchecked, ongoing bankruptcies would mean there may be no
financial resources left for impaired claimants in the future. 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Supreme Court of Texas in
SECTION 1 (Section 90.001, Civil Practices and Remedies Code) of this
bill. 

ANALYSIS

Amends Title 4, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, by adding Chapter 90,
CLAIMS INVOLVING EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS FIBERS OR OTHER MINERAL DUSTS. 

Requires the Supreme Court of Texas to adopt rules to provide for the
creation of an inactive docket for claims alleging personal injury or
death caused by exposure to asbestos or other mineral dusts. The Supreme
Court is required to establish procedures for the administration and
implementation of the inactive docket subject to certain mandatory
guidelines.   

The rules must provide that claimants suffering from mesothelioma or other
malignancy allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos fibers, who are still
living, would bypass the inactive docket and receive preferential,
accelerated trial settings to ensure prompt resolution.  

The rules must provide that all claims alleging personal injury or death
caused by exposure to asbestos fibers or other mineral dusts (other than a
diagnosis of mesothelioma or malignancy allegedly caused by asbestos when
the claimant is still living) are placed on the inactive docket when
filed.   

The rules must provide that a claim may be removed from the inactive
docket only if certain medical criteria for nonmalignant claims is met.  

Requires that the rules must toll the statute of limitations as of the
original date on which the claim was filed.  The rules must provide that a
claim on the inactive docket is not subject to discovery or other court
order of the trial court affecting active claims.  

Rules adopted must establish procedures to remove claims from the inactive
to the active docket on a showing of certain medical criteria.  The rules
must assure a reasonable and adequate time for discovery and trial
preparation consistent with Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.  The medical
criteria  for removing a claim alleging exposure to asbestos fibers from
the inactive to the active docket must be no less stringent than the
impairment standards adopted in February 2003 by the American Bar
Association for nonmalignant claims.  The medical criteria for claims
related to other mineral dusts must be based on objective medical criteria
indicating significant respiratory impairment caused to a reasonable
degree of medical probability by exposure to the particular dust or dusts
in question.   
The rules adopted must provide that in the event a defendant controverts
the claimant's showing that the medical criteria for removal of a claim
have been satisfied, an independent medical expert may be appointed by the
trial court to review the claimant's medical reports, detailed medical and
occupational history, and other information and make a recommendation to
the trial court. 

The rules must provide that the medical criteria required for removal be
completed by a physician with the appropriate Texas board certification in
occupational disease, oncology, pulmonary medicine, pathology, or internal
medicine.  The rules must also provide that all x-ray readings necessary
be performed by a certified B-reader.   

The rules must provide for the collection and dissemination of information
regarding all claims assigned to and removed from the inactive docket in
each trial court in this state.  The rules must ensure that the
appropriate filing fee is paid and that a reasonable portion of the fee be
used to support the administration of the inactive docket. 

The rules must provide that any claimant with a claim on the active or
inactive docket is eligible to participate in any bankruptcy trust
established to compensate claimants alleging injury from exposure to
asbestos fibers or other mineral dusts. 

Provides that the Act applies to all actions:  (1) commenced on or after
the effective date; or (2) pending on that effective date and in which the
trial, or any new trial or retrial following motion, appeal, or otherwise,
begins on or after the effective date. 

EFFECTIVE DATE

Upon passage, or, if the Act does not receive the necessary vote, the Act
takes effect November 1, 2003. 


COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE

The substitute differs from the original by requiring the Texas Supreme
Court to promulgate rules for the creation and operation of an inactive
docket for claims alleging personal injury or death caused by exposure to
asbestos fibers or other mineral dusts.  C.S.H.B. 47 establishes certain
guidelines including that the medical criteria must be no less stringent
than the American Bar Association's February 2003 impairment standards for
nonmalignant asbestos claims.  Details related to court procedures are
left to the court to promulgate, within mandatory guidelines.