C.S.S.B. 104 78(R)    BILL ANALYSIS


C.S.S.B. 104
By: Nelson
Public Health
Committee Report (Substituted)



BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

The Texas State Board of Medical Examiners (board) currently licenses and
enforces licensure requirements of physicians in Texas.  The board's
mission is to protect and enhance the public's health, safety, and welfare
by establishing and maintaining standards of excellence used in the
practice of medicine and ensuring quality health care for the citizens of
Texas through licensure, discipline and education.  In response to a
growing crisis in the cost and availability of medical liability insurance
for physicians, efforts were begun to improve the quality of medical care
provided in Texas.  In May of 2002, the Office of the Governor Trusteed
Programs made an emergency appropriation to the board of $200,000 to
improve the investigation and resolution of medical malpractice claims and
to reorganize and improve the medical malpractice claims division.
Additionally, the board began implementing improvements to their
licensure, business practices, investigations, and discipline procedures.
This legislation is in response to concerns raised by the board and
stakeholders regarding physician licensure and discipline procedures.    

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
  
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly
modified or granted to the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners in
SECTION  4 (Section 154.056(a) and (e), Occupations Code), SECTION 7
(Section 156.001(c)(3), Occupations Code),  SECTION 8 (Section 156.002
(b), Occupations Code), SECTION 9 (Section 156.003 (a), Occupations Code),
SECTION 19 (Section 164.001(f), Occupations Code),  SECTION 20 (Section
164.003(b), Occupations Code) of this bill. 
 

ANALYSIS

C.S.S.B 104 changes the licensure for physicians from an annual process to
a biennial process.  The bill makes changes to the fee schedule, the
registration and the renewal processes to reflect the biennial licensure
process.  The bill also clarifies that the registration renewal
application can only be issued if, in addition to holding a current
license, the license holder has met current continuing medical education
requirements and has filed a physician profile with the board. 

The bill establishes a new registration permit surcharge of $30 which
shall be used to strengthen the board's enforcement division and for the
expert panels. 

The bill increases the penalty and renewal fees for physicians who are
renewing their license after their current license has expired. 

The bill requires the board to prioritize complaints involving sexual
misconduct, quality of care, and impaired physicians.  Additionally, the
board is required to advise the license holder who was the subject of the
complaint by explaining the action taken on the complaint. 

The bill authorizes the creation of an expert panel of physicians of a
same or similar specialty to assist with reviewing complaints relating to
medical competency.  The board by rule shall describe the composition,
responsibilities, and qualifications for the expert panel.  The expert
panel is required to prepare a report regarding the facts of the case and
the panel's determination of the case.    
The bill updates the qualifying specialty board certifications that can be
approved by the board to reflect changes to the name and organization of
those specialty boards. 
 
The bill requires that the board by rule shall adopt a schedule of
disciplinary sanctions appropriate to the severity of the actions. 

The bill requires the board to conduct the informal proceedings within 180
days, unless the board can show good cause for delay, and requires the
board to provide 30 days notice of those proceedings to the physician.
Additionally, the bill clarifies the rights of the license holder
participating during the informal proceedings.  The bill clarifies the
information required to be provided to the license holder during the
informal proceedings.  Proceedings for license holders previously
disciplined are expedited. 

The bill establishes the process for the board to dismiss a baseless
complaint and to record that dismissal in the license holder's record. 

The bill clarifies that the due process requirements of the board include
providing the license holder with a statement of the allegation of the
standard of care violated by the physician and other information required
to be provided to the license holder during the due process requirements. 

The bill requires that the board immediately investigate license holders
who violate disciplinary orders or have an additional complaint filed when
under a disciplinary order. 

The bill clarifies the board's responsibility and the judicial process
when a license holder is found to be a danger to the public. 

The bill allows the board the ability to refuse to issue a license to a
person who is convicted of, or is placed on deferred adjudication
community supervision, or deferred disposition of certain offenses. 

The bill requires the board to revoke the license of a license holder who
has had his license revoked in another state. 

The bill includes in the definition of unprofessional or dishonorable
conduct the violation of any state or federal law. 

The bill requires the board to revoke the license of a license holder who
has been convicted of a misdemeanor under Chapter 22, of the Penal Code,
other than an offense punishable by a fine only.   
The bill clarifies that the board shall adopt guidelines for use in
issuing a temporary suspension of a license when it is determined that a
physician's continuing practice presents a real danger to the physician's
patients.  Additionally, the bill directs the board and the State Office
of Administrative Hearings to expedite the due process requirements once a
license has been temporarily suspended. The bill also clarifies that the
board, when seeking a temporary suspension, must have new information if
the first attempt at temporary suspension has failed. 

The bill allows the board to receive information about the violation of a
workers' compensation law by a license holder. 


EFFECTIVE DATE

This act has immediate effect if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all
members elected to each house, as provided by Section 39, Article III,
Texas Constitution.  If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for
immediate effect, this act takes effect September 1, 2003. 


COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE

The substitute differs from the original by redefining the standard for
temporary suspensions.  The substitute changes the day of the license fee
update from the last day to the first day of the birth month.  The
substitute differs from the original by removing the requirement that
board update  physician profiles when a jury makes an award against a
physician.  The substitute removes language from the original requiring
the board to report aggregate complaint information.  The substitute
differs from the original by removing language requiring the release of
complaint reports to instances when there is a negative finding.  The
substitute differs from the original by removing language requiring the
board to review the National Practitioners Data Bank for reports of
disciplinary actions taken against the physician.  The substitute removes
language requiring the board to send a letter to patients explaining why
the board did not take action on a complaint.  The substitute  differs
from the original by removing language that requires the board to collect
copies of 4590i expert reports from insurers.  The substitute differs from
the original by removing language that requires the board consider more
severe sanctions against repeat offenders.  The substitute differs from
the original by removing language dealing with disclosure exemptions for
peer review.  The substitute differs from the original by redefining what
constitutes confidential board work product during an investigation. The
substitute differs from the original by removing language requiring that a
formal complaint be filed against physicians who have had three expert
reports filed by insurers at the board.  The substitute differs from the
original by removing language that requires that the board investigate
physicians who have had three or move expert reports filed against them in
a five year period.  The substitute differs from the original by adding
certain misdemeanor crimes under Chapter 22 of the Penal Code as grounds
for license revocation.  The substitute differs from the original by
changing the requirement that the board schedule a disciplinary panel
within 10 days of notice of temporary suspension to 14 days of notice.